Literature DB >> 9478287

Epidemiology of permanent childhood hearing impairment in Trent Region, 1985-1993.

H Fortnum1, A Davis.   

Abstract

This retrospective study of permanent childhood hearing impairment (PCHI) > or = 40 dB HL in children born between 1985 and 1993 and resident in Trent Health Region, achieved an ascertainment of 92.9% of that expected from previous studies and 100% for the subset of children born between 1985 and 1990. The prevalence rate of all permanent hearing impairment > or = 40 dB HL for the birth cohort 1985-90 is 133 (95% confidence interval, (ci) 122-145) per 100,000 live births (1 in 750). Sixteen per cent of PCHI were postnatally acquired, late-onset or progressive impairments. Excluding these, the prevalence rate for congenital impairments is 112 (ci 101-123) per 100,000 (1 in 900). The rate for profound impairments > or = 95 dB HL is 24 (ci 20-30) per 100,000 live births (1 in 4150). Prevalence was increased sixfold for children with a history of neonatal intensive care and 14-fold for children with a family history, compared with children with no risk factors. A more than two-fold increase in prevalence was seen in Asian children. For the congenitally-impaired children born between 1985 and 1990, 29% had a stay in neonatal intensive care > or = 48 hours, 30% had a family history of permanent childhood hearing impairment, and 12% had a cranio-facial abnormality (CFA). Over 59% were potentially detectable by a targeted neonatal screening programme using these three high-risk factors. For 1985-1993, the overall yield of the targeted neonatal screening programmes available in three of the 11 health districts was 15% but increased over time. The overall yield from the Health Visitor distraction test was 30% but lower in districts with neonatal screening programmes. Only 59% of children had a stated aetiology, classified by time of onset into genetic, including syndromes and CFA (41%), pre- or peri-natal (10%), post-natally acquired (6%), and uncertain onset (2%). Just under 40% of the children were said to have another clinical or developmental problem, about half of whom had at least two additional problems. The median age at referral, confirmation of the impairment, prescription of the hearing aid and fitting of the hearing aid were, respectively, 10.4 months, 18.1 months, 24.4 months and 26.3 months. A more severe impairment was associated with earlier age. Small improvements in the median age of hearing aid prescription and fitting were seen over time. Twenty-five per cent of children were referred for genetic counselling, the proportion increasing systematically with the severity of the impairment. Based on evidence of the yield from hearing screens we suggest a wider implementation of neonatal screening and further consideration of the role of the health visitor distraction test in the identification of children with PCHI. To facilitate further assessment of services for hearing-impaired children we suggest implementation of a co-ordinated shared list of children with permanent hearing impairment on a region-wide basis to provide adequate numbers for comparison over time, and the routine collection of a minimum set of data for each child.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9478287     DOI: 10.3109/03005364000000037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  26 in total

1.  Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment. Family friendly hearing services are needed in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Shamim Amis; Dominic Byrne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-19

2.  Measuring the prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment.

Authors:  S Russ
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

3.  Preschool hearing, speech, language, and vision screening.

Authors:  J Bamford; A Davis; J Boyle; J Law; S Chapman; S S Brown; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

4.  Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project. Discussion of the results of newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (part II).

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Thomas Wiesner; Holger Drews; Frank Müller; Achim Breitfuss; Regina Schiller; Markus Hess
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 5.  Congenital hearing loss.

Authors:  Anna M H Korver; Richard J H Smith; Guy Van Camp; Mark R Schleiss; Maria A K Bitner-Glindzicz; Lawrence R Lustig; Shin-Ichi Usami; An N Boudewyns
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 52.329

6.  Cx26 deafness: mutation analysis and clinical variability.

Authors:  A Murgia; E Orzan; R Polli; M Martella; C Vinanzi; E Leonardi; E Arslan; F Zacchello
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 7.  Personally Modifiable Risk Factors Associated with Pediatric Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Adam P Vasconcellos; Meghann E Kyle; Sapideh Gilani; Jennifer J Shin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Variations in genetic assessment and recurrence risks quoted for childhood deafness: a survey of clinical geneticists.

Authors:  M J Parker; H Fortnum; I D Young; A C Davis
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  The promoter mutation c.-259C>T (-3438C>T) is not a common cause of non-syndromic hearing impairment in Austria.

Authors:  Martin Koenighofer; Trevor Lucas; Thomas Parzefall; Reinhard Ramsebner; Christian Schoefer; Klemens Frei
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Economic evaluation of newborn hearing screening: modelling costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Franz Hessel; Eva Grill; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Uwe Siebert; Silke Kunze; Andreas Nickisch; Hubertus von Voss; Jürgen Wasem
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2003-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.