Literature DB >> 9477186

Relationship between prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and degree of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer: comparison with prostatic acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase.

S Akimoto1, Y Furuya, K Akakura, J Shimazaki, H Ito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study was designed to examine the relation of the levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) to clinical stage and bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients.
METHODS: Serum PSA, PAP, and ALP levels were evaluated in 272 patients with prostate cancer. The relation of the level of PSA, PAP, and ALP to clinical stage and to degree of bone metastasis were examined by a multiple comparison method using ranks. The superiority of a marker in the rate of detection of bone metastasis was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The correlation coefficients of the order of the extent of bone metastasis with PSA, PAP, and ALP were examined with Spearman's rank order correlation coefficient test.
RESULTS: The levels of PSA showed significant differences among 8 pairs of clinical stages. In contrast, the levels of PAP showed significant differences among 6 pairs, and the levels of ALP showed significant differences among only 4 pairs. The area under the ROC curves of PSA, PAP, and ALP for revealing bone metastasis was 84.9%, 81.4%, and 77.3%, respectively. The correlation coefficients of the order of extent of disease (EOD) with log (PSA), log (PAP), and log (ALP) were 0.346, 0.394, and 0.618, respectively, and the levels of ALP showed the most significant differences regarding the extent of bone metastasis.
CONCLUSION: PSA was the best marker for differentiating clinical stages, but showed limited reliability for stratifying the extent of bone metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9477186     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.1997.tb00311.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  5 in total

Review 1.  Acid phosphatases.

Authors:  H Bull; P G Murray; D Thomas; A M Fraser; P N Nelson
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2002-04

2.  Novel oncogene-induced metastatic prostate cancer cell lines define human prostate cancer progression signatures.

Authors:  Xiaoming Ju; Adam Ertel; Mathew C Casimiro; Zuoren Yu; Hui Meng; Peter A McCue; Rhonda Walters; Paolo Fortina; Michael P Lisanti; Richard G Pestell
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Kinetic Studies of Newly Patented Aminoalkanol Derivatives with Potential Anticancer Activity as Competitive Inhibitors of Prostate Acid Phosphatase.

Authors:  Błażej Grodner; Mariola Napiórkowska; Dariusz Maciej Pisklak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  The prognostic power of inflammatory indices and clinical factors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with radium-223 (BIO-Ra study).

Authors:  Matteo Bauckneht; Sara Elena Rebuzzi; Alessio Signori; Viviana Frantellizzi; Veronica Murianni; Elisa Lodi Rizzini; Manlio Mascia; Valentina Lavelli; Maria Isabella Donegani; Marta Ponzano; Angela Gaudiano; Maria Lina Stazza; Maria Licari; Letizia Cavallini; Viola Laghi; Luca Cindolo; Martina Maggi; Alessandro Sciarra; Paolo Mammucci; Gianmario Sambuceti; Renato Patrizio Costa; Angela Spanu; Giuseppe Rubini; Fabio Monari; Giuseppe De Vincentis; Giuseppe Fornarini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Segmented linear correlations between bone scan index and prostate cancer biomarkers, alkaline phosphatase, and prostate specific antigen in patients with a Gleason score ≥7.

Authors:  Ebrahim Tasmeera; Hadebe Bawinile; Aldous Colleen; Partson Tinarwo; Nozipho Nyakale
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.