Literature DB >> 9477059

Identification of a genetic region in mice that specifies sensitivity to propofol.

V J Simpson1, B A Rikke, J M Costello, R Corley, T E Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-sleep (LS) and short-sleep (SS) mice, initially selected for differential sensitivity to ethanol, also exhibit differential sensitivity to propofol. By interbreeding LS and SS mice to obtain progeny whose chromosomes are a patchwork of the LS and SS chromosomes, the authors determined whether differential propofol sensitivity cosegregates with any particular chromosomal region(s). Such cosegregation is the essence of genetic linkage mapping and a first step toward isolating a gene that can modulate propofol sensitivity in mammals. A gene underlying a quantitative trait such as anesthetic sensitivity is commonly called a quantitative trait locus (QTL).
METHODS: The propofol dose was 20 mg/kg injected retroorbitally. Sensitivity was measured as the duration of the loss of righting reflex (LORR). The LORR and propofol brain levels at awakening were determined for 24 LSXSS recombinant-inbred (RI) strains, derived by intercrossing LS and SS for two generations followed by >20 generations of inbreeding. A genetic linkage between LORR and an albino mutation on chromosome 7 was investigated further using 164 second-generation progeny (F2s) from intercrossing inbred LS and inbred SS mice, similar to the LSXSS RIs except F2s are not inbred. The linkage between propofol sensitivity and the albino locus also was investigated using additional genetic markers on chromosome 7. Statistical significance was assessed by interval mapping using a regression method for RIs and Mapmaker/QTL (Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, MA) for F2s.
RESULTS: Genetic mapping in the LSXSS RIs revealed a QTL tightly linked to the Tyr (albino) locus that accounts for nearly all of the genetic difference in propofol sensitivity between LS and SS mice. Analysis of propofol brain levels at awakening indicated that this QTL results from differential neurosensitivity. Mapping in F2s confirmed the genetic linkage to Tyr. Mice (ISS c/c x C57BL/6 c2j/C) that differed only by an albino mutation at Tyr were not differentially sensitive to propofol.
CONCLUSIONS: A single QTL, called Lorp1, underlies most of the genetic difference in propofol neurosensitivity between LS and SS mice. Although this QTL is tightly linked to Tyr, propofol sensitivity is not modulated by albinism. For mapping this QTL, the LSXSS RIs proved to be an especially powerful resource, localizing the candidate-gene region to a 99% confidence interval of only 2.5 centimorgans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9477059     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199802000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

1.  The metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 mediates sensitivity to the sedative properties of ethanol.

Authors:  Chris Downing; Michael J Marks; Colin Larson; Thomas E Johnson
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  No effect of prenatal alcohol exposure on activity in three inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Chris Downing; Christina Balderrama-Durbin; Jonathan Hayes; Thomas E Johnson; David Gilliam
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 2.826

3.  Anesthetic sensitivity: learning to fly.

Authors:  Max B Kelz; Eliot Friedman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Mapping quantitative trait loci mediating sensitivity to etomidate.

Authors:  Chris Downing; Elaine H Shen; Victoria J Simpson; Thomas E Johnson
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Differences in cardiovascular sensitivity to propofol in a chromosome substitution rat model.

Authors:  Thomas A Stekiel; Craig A Weber; Stephen J Contney; Zeljko J Bosnjak
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.351

6.  High throughput modular chambers for rapid evaluation of anesthetic sensitivity.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Jingqiu Chen; Gregory Pruckmayr; James E Baumgardner; David M Eckmann; Roderic G Eckenhoff; Max B Kelz
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Mapping the contribution of beta3-containing GABAA receptors to volatile and intravenous general anesthetic actions.

Authors:  Anja Zeller; Margarete Arras; Rachel Jurd; Uwe Rudolph
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol       Date:  2007-02-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.