Literature DB >> 9476320

First-trimester screening for fetal aneuploidy: biochemistry and nuchal translucency.

F Orlandi1, G Damiani, T W Hallahan, D A Krantz, J N Macri.   

Abstract

Maternal dried whole-blood specimens were collected prospectively from 2010 singleton pregnancies between 9 + 0 and 13 + 4 weeks that included 18 chromosomally abnormal pregnancies (11 Down's syndrome, four trisomy 18, two trisomy 13 and one triploidy). A subset of 744 pregnancies underwent ultrasound nuchal translucency measurement and included seven Down's syndrome, four trisomy 18, two trisomy 13 and one triploidy. Patients were evaluated for risk of Down's syndrome and trisomy 18 based on biochemistry (free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A), nuchal translucency and the combination of both. In prospective biochemical screening, false-positive rates for Down's syndrome and trisomy 18 were 5.1% (66/1297) and 1.9% (25/1297) in women < 35 years of age and 14.2% (99/695) and 1.6% (11/695) in women > or = 35 years of age, respectively. The detection efficiency of aneuploidy was 6/6 (100%) in women < 35 years and 11/12 (92%) in women > or = 35 years. Nuchal translucency measurement alone detected 57% (8/14) of cases of aneuploidy at a 5.8% (42/730) false-positive rate. Modelling with the age distribution of live births, a 5% false-positive rate resulted in Down's syndrome detection efficiency of 61% by biochemistry, 73% by nuchal translucency and 87% by combining both methods. The data in this study demonstrate that combined biochemical and ultrasound evaluation for Down's syndrome and other chromosomal abnormalities in the first trimester of pregnancy yield a detection capability that may exceed that of current second-trimester prenatal screening protocols. The potential for enhanced detection coupled to an earlier alert of fetal complications could represent a substantial advantage to both clinician and patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9476320     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10060381.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  10 in total

1.  Wrongful birth litigation and prenatal screening.

Authors:  Mark Pioro; Roxanne Mykitiuk; Jeff Nisker
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  A historical and practical review of first trimester aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Melissa L Russo; Karin J Blakemore
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Prenatal diagnosis and fetal therapy--what lies in future?

Authors:  J Mauldin
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 4.  Down's syndrome screening: a controversial test, with more controversy to come!

Authors:  T M Reynolds
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

6.  A prospective two years study of first trimester screening for Down syndrome.

Authors:  V Zournatzi; A Daniilidis; C Karidas; T Tantanasis; A Loufopoulos; J Tzafettas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.471

7.  Prenatal screening methods for aneuploidies.

Authors:  Madhusudan Dey; Sumedha Sharma; Sumita Aggarwal
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03

Review 8.  First trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30

Review 9.  Beyond Trisomy 21: Additional Chromosomal Anomalies Detected through Routine Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Amy Metcalfe; Catriona Hippman; Melanie Pastuck; Jo-Ann Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Maternal Serum Screening Markers and Adverse Outcome: A New Perspective.

Authors:  David Krantz; Terrence Hallahan; David Janik; Jonathan Carmichael
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.