Literature DB >> 9475852

Reflex responses to regional venous pooling during lower body negative pressure in humans.

J R Halliwill1, L A Lawler, T J Eickhoff, M J Joyner, S L Mulvagh.   

Abstract

Lower body negative pressure is frequently used to simulate orthostasis. Prior data suggest that venous pooling in abdominal or pelvic regions may have major hemodynamic consequences. Therefore, we developed a simple paradigm for assessing regional contributions to venous pooling during lower body negative pressure. Sixteen healthy men and women underwent graded lower body negative pressure protocols to 60 mmHg while wearing medical anti-shock trousers to prevent venous pooling under three randomized conditions: 1) no trouser inflation (control), 2) only the trouser legs inflated, and 3) the trouser legs and abdominopelvic region inflated. Without trouser inflation, heart rate increased 28 +/- 4 beats/min, mean arterial pressure fell -3 +/- 2 mmHg, and forearm vascular resistance increased 51 +/- 9 units at 60 mmHg lower body negative pressure. With inflation of either the trouser legs or the trouser legs and abdominopelvic region, heart rate and mean arterial pressure did not change during lower body negative pressure. By contrast, although the forearm vasoconstrictor response to lower body negative pressure was attenuated by inflation of the trouser legs (delta forearm vascular resistance 33 +/- 10 units, P < 0.05 vs. control), attenuation was greater with the inflation of the trouser legs and abdominopelvic region (delta forearm vascular resistance 16 +/- 5 units, P < 0.05 vs. control and trouser legs-only inflation). Thus the hemodynamic consequences of pooling in the abdominal and pelvic regions during lower body negative pressure appear to be less than in the legs in healthy individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9475852     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.2.454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  14 in total

1.  Limb neurovascular control during altered otolithic input in humans.

Authors:  Kevin D Monahan; Chester A Ray
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Greater orthostatic tolerance in young black compared with white women.

Authors:  Kumba Hinds; Nina S Stachenfeld
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Cortical regions associated with autonomic cardiovascular regulation during lower body negative pressure in humans.

Authors:  Derek S Kimmerly; Deborah D O'Leary; Ravi S Menon; Joseph S Gati; J Kevin Shoemaker
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Differential effects of lower body negative pressure and upright tilt on splanchnic blood volume.

Authors:  Indu Taneja; Christopher Moran; Marvin S Medow; June L Glover; Leslie D Montgomery; Julian M Stewart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Does peripheral nerve degeneration affect circulatory responses to head-up tilt in spinal cord-injured individuals?

Authors:  Jan T Groothuis; Cécile R L Boot; Sibrand Houtman; Herman van Langen; Maria T E Hopman
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.435

6.  Aortic distensibility is reduced during intense lower body negative pressure and is related to low frequency power of systolic blood pressure.

Authors:  Aaron A Phillips; Shannon S D Bredin; Anita T Cote; C Taylor Drury; Darren E R Warburton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Pathophysiological basis of orthostatic hypotension in autonomic failure.

Authors:  A A Smit; J R Halliwill; P A Low; W Wieling
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Leg vascular resistance increases during head-up tilt in paraplegics.

Authors:  Jan T Groothuis; Cécile R L Boot; Sibrand Houtman; Herman van Langen; Maria T E Hopman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  The Benefits of Oral Rehydration on Orthostatic Intolerance in Children with Postural Tachycardia Syndrome.

Authors:  Marvin S Medow; Kenneth Guber; Shilpan Chokshi; Courtney Terilli; Paul Visintainer; Julian M Stewart
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 10.  POTS versus deconditioning: the same or different?

Authors:  Michael J Joyner; Shizue Masuki
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 4.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.