INTRODUCTION: Several modalities of catheter ablation have been proposed to eliminate Mahaim pathway conduction. However, limited research has been reported on the electrophysiologic nature of this pathway in its entity. METHODS AND RESULTS: In seven patients, electrophysiologic study was performed, and radiofrequency energy was applied to investigate the electrophysiologic clues for successful ablation. In all seven patients, the Mahaim pathway was diagnosed as a right-sided atriofascicular or atrioventricular pathway with decremental properties. In two patients, two different kinds of electrograms were recorded through the ablation catheter positioned at the Mahaim pathway location: one was suggestive of conduction over the decremental portion, demonstrating a dulled potential; and the other of nondecremental conduction, demonstrating a spiked potential. All but one of the Mahaim pathways were eliminated successfully at the atrial origin where the spiked Mahaim potential was recorded. Radiofrequency energy application was performed at the slow potential site resulting in failure to eliminate the conduction over the Mahaim pathway. Conduction block at the site between the slow and fast potential recording sites was provoked by intravenous administration of adenosine, concomitant with a decrease in the amplitude of the Mahaim potential. In one patient, the clinical arrhythmia was a sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia originating from the ventricular end of the Mahaim fiber. CONCLUSION: The identification of Mahaim spiked potentials may be the optimal method to permit their successful ablation. Detailed electrophysiologic assessment is indispensable for successful ablation of tachycardias associated with Mahaim fibers because tachycardias unassociated with Mahaim fibers can occur despite complete elimination of the Mahaim fiber.
INTRODUCTION: Several modalities of catheter ablation have been proposed to eliminate Mahaim pathway conduction. However, limited research has been reported on the electrophysiologic nature of this pathway in its entity. METHODS AND RESULTS: In seven patients, electrophysiologic study was performed, and radiofrequency energy was applied to investigate the electrophysiologic clues for successful ablation. In all seven patients, the Mahaim pathway was diagnosed as a right-sided atriofascicular or atrioventricular pathway with decremental properties. In two patients, two different kinds of electrograms were recorded through the ablation catheter positioned at the Mahaim pathway location: one was suggestive of conduction over the decremental portion, demonstrating a dulled potential; and the other of nondecremental conduction, demonstrating a spiked potential. All but one of the Mahaim pathways were eliminated successfully at the atrial origin where the spiked Mahaim potential was recorded. Radiofrequency energy application was performed at the slow potential site resulting in failure to eliminate the conduction over the Mahaim pathway. Conduction block at the site between the slow and fast potential recording sites was provoked by intravenous administration of adenosine, concomitant with a decrease in the amplitude of the Mahaim potential. In one patient, the clinical arrhythmia was a sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia originating from the ventricular end of the Mahaim fiber. CONCLUSION: The identification of Mahaim spiked potentials may be the optimal method to permit their successful ablation. Detailed electrophysiologic assessment is indispensable for successful ablation of tachycardias associated with Mahaim fibers because tachycardias unassociated with Mahaim fibers can occur despite complete elimination of the Mahaim fiber.