Literature DB >> 9475532

Aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allograft: ten-year experience.

J R Doty1, J D Salazar, J R Liddicoat, J H Flores, D B Doty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cryopreserved aortic allograft can be used for aortic valve replacement in congenital, rheumatic, degenerative, and infected native valve conditions, as well as failed prosthetic valves. This study was conducted to determine the long-term results of aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allografts.
METHODS: Aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allografts was performed in 117 patients from July 1985 until August 1996. All patients requiring aortic valve replacement regardless of valve disease were considered for allograft replacement; the valve was preferentially used in patients under age 55 years and in the setting of bacterial endocarditis. Four operative techniques involving cryopreserved aortic allografts were used: freehand aortic valve replacement with 120-degree rotation, freehand aortic valve replacement with intact noncoronary sinus, aortic root enlargement with intact noncoronary sinus, and total aortic root replacement. Valve function was assessed by echocardiography during the operation in 78 patients (66%) and after the operation in 77 patients (65%).
RESULTS: One-hundred eighteen aortic valve replacements with cryopreserved aortic allografts were performed on 117 patients; mean age was 45.6 years (range 15 to 83 years) and mean follow-up was 4.6 years (range up to 11 years). Intraoperative echocardiography disclosed no significant aortic valve incompetence. There were four operative deaths (3%) and seven late deaths; freedom from valve-related mortality at 10 years was 9:3% +/- 4.55%. New York Heart Association functional status at latest follow-up was normal in 98 (94%) patients. On postoperative echocardiography, 90% had no or trivial aortic valve incompetence. Freedom from thromboembolism at 10 years was 100% and from endocarditis, 98% +/- 2.47%. Seven (6%) patients required valve explantation, four for structural deterioration. At 10 years, freedom from reoperation for allograft-related causes was 92% +/- 3.47%.
CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allografts can be performed with low perioperative and long-term mortality. Most patients have excellent functional status, and reoperation for valve-related causes is unusual. Aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allografts demonstrates excellent freedom from thromboembolism, endocarditis, and progressive valve incompetence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9475532     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70281-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  4 in total

1.  Cryopreservation of the tracheal grafts: Review and perspective.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakanishi
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Freehand cryopreserved mitral valve allograft with flexible ring in the pig.

Authors:  M Osako; R Hattori; Y Nakao; T Yamamura; H Fujii; H Otani; Y Konaka; S Takeuchi; H Imamura
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-12

3.  Aortic root widening: "pro et contra".

Authors:  Balaji Srimurugan; Neethu Krishna; Rajesh Jose; Kirun Gopal; Praveen Kerala Varma
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-02-22

4.  Evaluation and management of aortic valve and root disease.

Authors:  John B de Graft-Johnson; Thomas G Gleason
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.