Literature DB >> 9475018

Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in India.

L Dandona1, K Ragu, M Janarthanan, T J Naduvilath, R Shenoy, G N Rao.   

Abstract

Indications for penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in the developing world from a large series are not well documented. This study was done to evaluate the indications for PK in a major eye care institution in India. The records for a consecutive series of 1,964 PKs were analysed and multiple logistic regression was used to study the effect of age, socioeconomic status and sex on the indications for PK. The indications for PK were corneal scarring in 551 (28.1%) including adherent leukoma in 147 (7.5%), regrafts in 336 (17.1%), active infectious keratitis in 239 (12.2%), aphakic bullous keratopathy in 231 (11.8%), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy in 209 (10.6%), corneal dystrophies in 165 (8.4%) including Fuchs' dystrophy in 23 (1.2%), keratoconus in 118 (6%), and miscellaneous in 115 (5.9%). The odds that the patient belonged to lower socioeconomic status were significantly higher if the PK was done for active infectious keratitis (odds ratio 2.73, p < 0.0001), corneal scarring (odds ratio 1.72, p = 0.0009) or regraft (odds ratio 1.44, p = 0.047). Corneal scarring, including adherent leukoma, and active infectious keratitis are relatively more common indications whereas keratoconus, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy and Fuchs' dystrophy are less common indications for PK in India than reported from the developed world. Indications for PK which carry a poorer prognosis for graft survival are relatively more common in India than in the developed world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9475018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


  29 in total

Review 1.  Bilateral penetrating keratoplasty--indications, results and review of literature.

Authors:  S K Rao; R R Sudhir; R Fogla; R Rajagopal; G Sitalakshmi; P Padmanabhan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in East China, 1994-2003.

Authors:  Chaoran Zhang; Jianjiang Xu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Corneal ulcer: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  P Garg; G N Rao
Journal:  Community Eye Health       Date:  1999

4.  Evaluation of the Central Corneal Thickness with Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomogram after Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Anuradha Raj; Renu Dhasmana; Harsh Bahadur; Ramesh Chander Nagpal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 5.  Corneal blindness and xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Vladimir Lamm; Hidetaka Hara; Alex Mammen; Deepinder Dhaliwal; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.907

6.  Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in southern India.

Authors:  Laxman Dasar; Chaitra Pujar; Kanwarpal Singh Gill; Madhuri Patil; Mallikarjun Salagar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-11-10

7.  Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Shandong, 2005-2010.

Authors:  Jun-Yi Wang; Li-Xin Xie; Xiu-Sheng Song; Jing Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  The use of glycerol-preserved corneas in the developing world.

Authors:  Michael R Feilmeier; Geoffrey C Tabin; Lloyd Williams; Matt Oliva
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01

9.  Indications and Visual Outcome of Penetrating Keratoplasty in Tertiary Eye Care Institute in Uttarakhand.

Authors:  Anuradha Raj; Neeti Gupta; Renu Dhasmana; Ramesh Chander Nagpal; Harsh Bahadur; Amit Maitreya
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01

10.  Corneal blindness in a southern Indian population: need for health promotion strategies.

Authors:  R Dandona; L Dandona
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.