Literature DB >> 9474730

Higher electrical stimulus intensities are required to activate chronically compressed nerve roots. Implications for intraoperative electromyographic pedicle screw testing.

N R Holland1, T A Lukaczyk, L H Riley, J P Kostuik.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A comparison of the electrical thresholds required to evoke myogenic responses from direct stimulation of normal and chronically compressed nerve roots.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intraoperative electromyographic testing to confirm the integrity of instrumented pedicles should be performed at higher stimulus intensities in cases where there is preoperative lumbosacral radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative neurologic deficits may occur as a result of pedicle screw misplacement during spinal instrumentation. The failure to evoke myogenic responses from stimulation of pedicle holes and screws at intensities of 6-8 mA is commonly used to exclude bony pedicular wall perforation.
METHODS: Direct nerve root stimulation was used to compare the stimulus thresholds of normal and compressed nerve roots in six patients with limb weakness from chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy.
RESULTS: The stimulus thresholds of chronically compressed nerve roots significantly exceeded those of normal nerve roots, indicating partial axonal loss (axonotmesis). In most cases, the direct stimulus thresholds of compressed nerve roots exceeded 10 mA.
CONCLUSIONS: When instrumentation is placed at spinal levels where there is preexisting chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy, holes and screws may need to be stimulated at higher intensities to exclude pedicular perforation and prevent further iatrogenic nerve root injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474730     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Surface electrodes are not sufficient to detect neurotonic discharges: observations in a porcine model and clinical review of deltoid electromyographic monitoring using multiple electrodes.

Authors:  Stanley A Skinner; Ensor E Transfeldt; Kay Savik
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Muscle relaxant use during intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.

Authors:  Tod B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon.

Authors:  Thomas N Pajewski; Vincent Arlet; Lawrence H Phillips
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Differences between Cervical Schwannomas of the Anterior and Posterior Nerve Roots in Relation to the Incidence of Postoperative Radicular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Yu-Ichiro Ohnishi; Koichi Iwatsuki; Toshika Ohkawa; Koshi Ninomiya; Takashi Moriwaki; Toshiki Yoshimine
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

5.  A review of intraoperative monitoring for spinal surgery.

Authors:  Mark M Stecker
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-07-17

6.  Triggered Electromyography is a Useful Intraoperative Adjunct to Predict Postoperative Neurological Deficit Following Lumbar Pedicle Screw Instrumentation.

Authors:  Rajiv P Reddy; Robert Chang; Dominic V Coutinho; Justin W Meinert; Katherine M Anetakis; Donald J Crammond; Jeffrey R Balzer; Jeremy D Shaw; Joon Y Lee; Parthasarathy D Thirumala
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-05-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.