Literature DB >> 9474546

The soft tissue response to osseointegrated dental implants.

H P Weber1, D L Cochran.   

Abstract

The use of dental implants in the treatment of fully edentulous patients has become an important addition in oral/dental rehabilitation. The fact that these implants penetrate the oral mucosa can lead to the assumption that peri-implant tissues, similar to the periodontal tissues, are fulfilling an important function as a barrier to protect the bony anchorage underneath. It has been shown that insufficient plaque removal may lead to peri-implant tissue disease with bone loss similar to teeth. However, it is unclear how important this cause is as a source of implant failure compared with other factors, such as inadequate bone healing, unfavorable quantity and quality of bone, or (bio)mechanical and functional problems. It is also not understood if peri-implant epithelium and connective tissue are equally needed and/or qualified to slow down or prevent tissue breakdown as their periodontal counterparts. The scientific work focusing on peri-implant soft tissues has dramatically increased in the past few years. Most studies to date have examined and described their structure but little data exist on their true biologic function. This review analyzes the current understanding of morphologic and clinical features of the peri-implant soft tissues. Furthermore, evidence shall be provided that peri-implant soft tissues do not interfere with the current favorable results obtained when treating the edentulous patient with osseointegrated implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474546     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70198-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

1.  Peri-implant complications for posterior endosteal implants.

Authors:  Josephine Esquivel-Upshaw; Alex Mehler; Arthur Clark; Dan Neal; Luiz Gonzaga; Kenneth Anusavice
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  A Comparative Study of Clinical Parameters in Submerged and Non submerged Implants.

Authors:  Parviz Torkzaban; Seyed Reza Arabi; Ghodratollah Roshanaei; Mohsen Rostami; Sara Soheilifar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

3.  A clinico radiographic study of immediate loading implants in rehabilitation of mandibular ridges.

Authors:  M Viswambaran; Vimal Arora; S H Gupta; R K Dhiman; N Thiruvalluvan
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-08-22

4.  A comparison of epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and osteoblasts in dental implant titanium topographies.

Authors:  Fu-Yuan Teng; Chia-Ling Ko; Hsien-Nan Kuo; Jin-Jia Hu; Jia-Horng Lin; Ching-Wen Lou; Chun-Cheng Hung; Yin-Lai Wang; Cheng-Yi Cheng; Wen-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Bioinorg Chem Appl       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 7.778

5.  Transfiguration of Smile by Anterior Tooth Replacement through Remodeling of Hard and Soft Tissue Profile with Adjunct to Implant Osseointegration.

Authors:  Devendra Chopra; Kaushitaki Bhaumik; Sumit Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2022-03-23

Review 6.  Progress in partially degradable titanium-magnesium composites used as biomedical implants.

Authors:  Jianping Wang; Zhifan Bao; Chenliang Wu; Song Zhang; Ningwei Wang; Qiang Wang; Zhe Yi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.