Literature DB >> 9474477

Multidrug-resistant gram-positive pathogens. An update on current microbiological patterns.

A Marchese1, E A Debbia, D Bacca, G Balistreri, B Musolino, G C Schito.   

Abstract

Although resistance has developed among Gram-positive pathogens to penicillins, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, quinolones and macrolides, the glycopeptides seem to remain largely unaffected. However, the recent emergence and range of glycopeptide resistance in enterococci, well documented in the USA but not in the rest of the world, have prompted this European surveillance study. The European Glycopeptide Resistance Survey was undertaken in 1995 in 9 countries and involved 70 microbiological centres. The primary aims of the survey were as follows: (i) to perform a microbiological quality assurance assessment to evaluate the ability of participating laboratories to correctly identify the strains and assess their glycopeptide susceptibility; and (ii) to accurately determine the level of glycopeptide resistance among staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci in European hospitals. The in vitro activity of several other antibiotics was assessed on strains isolated from the Italian centres. In total, 7078 Gram-positive isolates were collected in Europe, and national coordinators used the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) agar dilution reference method to successfully retest 96% of these. According to mode minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), teicoplanin activity was similar to that of vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus. In general, the range of MICs for teicoplanin was wider than that for vancomycin against coagulase-negative staphylococci. Against Enterococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp., teicoplanin was 4 times more active than vancomycin. The greatest number of glycopeptide refractory organisms was evident among enterococci; resistance was observed to be approximately 10 times more frequent in Enterococcus faecium than in E. faecalis. The results from the Italian isolates were similar to those from the overall study. In particular, teicoplanin was 2- to 8-fold more active than vancomycin against the majority of the enterococci. The incidence of enterococcal resistance was lower in Italy (0.6% for teicoplanin and 0.9% for vancomycin) than in Europe (1.7% for teicoplanin and 2.3% for vancomycin). This extensive survey confirms that teicoplanin is more active than vancomycin against enterococci and streptococci, and that both display similar potency against staphylococci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9474477     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199700546-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  18 in total

Review 1.  Detection of glycopeptide resistance in clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  N Woodford; A P Johnson; R C George
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.

Authors:  K Hiramatsu; H Hanaki; T Ino; K Yabuta; T Oguri; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  The effect of medium and inoculum on the activity of vancomycin and teicoplanin against coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  D Felmingham; K Solomonides; M D O'Hare; A P Wilson; R N Grüneberg
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  In-vitro studies with ramoplanin (MDL 62,198): a novel lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial.

Authors:  M D O'Hare; G Ghosh; D Felmingham; R N Grüneberg
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Quantitative analysis of the metabolism of soluble cytoplasmic peptidoglycan precursors of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  M Arthur; F Depardieu; P Reynolds; P Courvalin
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Major trends in the microbial etiology of nosocomial infection.

Authors:  D R Schaberg; D H Culver; R P Gaynes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-09-16       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 7.  Anti-infective treatment in intensive care: the role of glycopeptides.

Authors:  R N Grüneberg; A P Wilson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Reducing the spread of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms. Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  D K Shay; D A Goldmann; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.278

Review 9.  Hospital-acquired infections: diseases with increasingly limited therapies.

Authors:  M N Swartz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Co-transfer of vancomycin and other resistance genes from Enterococcus faecalis NCTC 12201 to Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  W C Noble; Z Virani; R G Cree
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 2.742

View more
  2 in total

1.  Heterogeneous vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in a large Italian hospital.

Authors:  A Marchese; G Balistreri; E Tonoli; E A Debbia; G C Schito
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Management of serious staphylococcal infections in the outpatient setting.

Authors:  W Graninger; E Presterl; C Wenisch; E Schwameis; S Breyer; T Vukovich
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.