Literature DB >> 9474449

Comparison of axial and instantaneous videokeratographic data in keratoconus and utility in contact lens curvature prediction.

L B Szczotka1, J Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Instantaneous radius of curvature data in corneal videokeratoscopy better represents corneal shape and local curvature changes in keratoconus than axial maps, especially in the periphery. Knowledge of instantaneous radius is especially important in keratoconus for analysis of the cone apex, which is often decentered. In this study, we quantitatively compared axial and instantaneous displays of videokeratographic data in keratoconus, with emphasis on apex curvature and position. We assessed the utility of instantaneous data for rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lens curvature selection and compared it with data derived from the original axial displays in keratoconus.
METHODS: We performed modern placido-based videokeratography on 35 eyes with clinically diagnosed keratoconus. We derived the apex curvature, the position of the apex relative to the center of the map, and the steep simulated keratometry (SIM-K) reading from axial and instantaneous videokeratographic displays. We also collected the RGP base curves for 28 eyes that were fit with a minimal apical bearing or clearance RGP contact lens.
RESULTS: The instantaneous apex was consistently located closer to the center of the map than the axial apex. Means (and standard deviations) for the best fit RGP base curve, axial steep SIM-K, axial apex curvature, instantaneous steep SIM-K, and instantaneous apex curvature were 52.00 D +/- 5.92 D, 50.93 D +/- 5.94 D, 54.81 D +/- 7.14 D, 49.19 D +/- 5.54 D, and 56.86 D +/- 7.89 D, respectively. Statistical comparisons revealed axial steep SIM-K to best represent the RGP base curve for the entire group. Similarly, in the subset of patients with apex decentrations within 1 mm of the map center, the axial steep SIM-K best represented the RGP base curve. In the remaining decentered cone subset, the axial apex curvature best represented the base curve.
CONCLUSIONS: Axial and instantaneous maps differ significantly in apical position and apex curvature in keratoconus. Although instantaneous radius may better represent corneal shape, axial curvatures better predict the final RGP base curve in keratoconus patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CLAO J        ISSN: 0733-8902


  6 in total

1.  Rigid contact lens fitting based on keratometry readings in keratoconus patients: predicting formula.

Authors:  Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Zahra Mohajernezhad-Fard; Seyede Khojaste Naseri; Fahimeh Jafari; Askar Doostdar; Parviz Zarrinbakhsh; Mohammad Bagher Rajabi; Sedigheh Kohansal
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Effects of multicurve RGP contact lens use on topographic changes in keratoconus.

Authors:  Joon Seo Hwang; Jin Hak Lee; Won Ryang Wee; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-03

Review 3.  Corneal topography in keratoconus: state of the art.

Authors:  F Cavas-Martínez; E De la Cruz Sánchez; J Nieto Martínez; F J Fernández Cañavate; D G Fernández-Pacheco
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

4.  Comprehensive Evaluation of Anterior Corneal Change in Asphericity Calculated by the Tangential Radius of Curvature after LASIK.

Authors:  Jinglu Ying; Jianqiu Cai; Leru Zhu; Yi Zha
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Evaluation of a Tangential Map-Based Nomogram for Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments' Implantation in Keratoconus: One Year Results.

Authors:  Adel Galal Zaky; Mahmoud Tawfik KhalafAllah; Abdelrahman Elsebaey Sarhan; Moataz Faiz Elsawy
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  A new technique for fitting of tricurve rigid gas-permeable contact lens in penetrating keratoplasty eyes using Scheimpflug imaging.

Authors:  Pratik Gogri; Faiza A Bhombal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.848

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.