Literature DB >> 9474342

Three-dimensional caricatures of human heads: distinctiveness and the perception of facial age.

A J O'Toole1, T Vetter, H Volz, E M Salter.   

Abstract

A standard facial-caricaturing algorithm was applied to a three-dimensional representation of human heads. This algorithm sometimes produced heads that appeared 'caricatured'. More commonly, however, exaggerating the distinctive three-dimensional information in a face seemed to produce an increase in the apparent age of the face--both at a local level, by exaggerating small facial creases into wrinkles, and at a more global level via changes that seemed to make the underlying structure of the skull more evident. Concomitantly, de-emphasis of the distinctive three-dimensional information in a face made it appear relatively younger than the veridical and caricatured faces. More formally, face-age judgments made by human observers were ordered according to the level of caricature, with anticaricatures judged younger than veridical faces, and veridical faces judged younger than caricatured faces. These results are discussed in terms of the importance of the nature of the features made more distinct by a caricaturing algorithm and the nature of human representation(s) of faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9474342     DOI: 10.1068/p260719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

1.  The face typicality-recognizability relationship: encoding or retrieval locus?

Authors:  K A Deffenbacher; J Johanson; T Vetter; A J O'Toole
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  Adaptation and the perception of facial age.

Authors:  Sean F O'Neil; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011

3.  The Reverse-Caricature Effect Revisited: Familiarization With Frontal Facial Caricatures Improves Veridical Face Recognition.

Authors:  Jobany Rodríguez; Heather Bortfeld; Isaac Rudomín; Benjamín Hernández; Ricardo Gutiérrez-Osuna
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  How Different is Different? Criterion and Sensitivity in Face-Space.

Authors:  Harold Hill; Peter Claes; Michelle Corcoran; Mark Walters; Alan Johnston; John Gerald Clement
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-03-23

Review 5.  An overview of the latest developments in facial imaging.

Authors:  Carl N Stephan; Jodi M Caple; Pierre Guyomarc'h; Peter Claes
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2018-10-29

6.  Morphometric approach to 3D soft-tissue craniofacial analysis and classification of ethnicity, sex, and age.

Authors:  Olalekan Agbolade; Azree Nazri; Razali Yaakob; Abdul Azim Ghani; Yoke Kqueen Cheah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How facial aging affects perceived gender: Insights from maximum likelihood conjoint measurement.

Authors:  Daniel Fitousi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Revisiting facial resemblance in couples.

Authors:  Yetta Kwailing Wong; Wing Wah Wong; Kelvin F H Lui; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An Adult Developmental Approach to Perceived Facial Attractiveness and Distinctiveness.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Joerg Luedicke; Manuel C Voelkle; Michaela Riediger; Tian Lin; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.