Literature DB >> 9474070

Dyspepsia: how should we measure it?

D H Kuykendall1, L Rabeneck, C J Campbell, N P Wray.   

Abstract

This study developed and validated a multidimensional measure of dyspepsia. A questionnaire was administered to 126 patients with dyspepsia who presented for care at a VA outpatient clinic and a family physician's private office. Dyspepsia-specific health was measured by self-report using: (1) an existing dyspepsia scale that produces an aggregate score by summing ratings across pain and non-pain symptoms; (2) adaptations of two scales originally designed to measure back pain; and (3) a new scale measuring satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health. Generic health was measured using the SF-36. Results from factor analysis revealed four dimensions of dyspepsia-related health: pain intensity, pain disability, non-pain symptoms, and satisfaction with dyspepsia-related health. After refinements, scales representing the four dimensions conformed to psychometric standards for reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity. The importance of measuring dyspepsia using a multidimensional approach was confirmed by demonstrating that classification of dyspepsia severity depended on the dimension that was assessed. We conclude that dyspepsia is best measured using a multidimensional approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474070     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00245-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  15 in total

1.  Best practice in symptom assessment: a review.

Authors:  E McColl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Population-based assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms and diseases: Cappadocia Cohort, Turkey.

Authors:  Orhan Sezgin; Hale Akpınar; Birol Özer; Murat Törüner; Kadir Bal; Serhat Bor
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  Patient-based assessment in dyspepsia: development and validation of Dyspepsia Symptom Severity Index (DSSI).

Authors:  N K Leidy; C Farup; A M Rentz; D Ganoczy; K L Koch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Age and alarm symptoms do not predict endoscopic findings among patients with dyspepsia: a multicentre database study.

Authors:  M B Wallace; V L Durkalski; J Vaughan; Y Y Palesch; E D Libby; P S Jowell; N J Nickl; S M Schutz; J W Leung; P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Validation of Spanish language dyspepsia questionnaire.

Authors:  Jonathan Goldman; Donald F Conrad; Catherine Ley; David Halperin; Maria de la Luz Sanchez; Rosario Villacorta; Julie Parsonnet
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  What makes the dyspeptic patient feel ill? A cross sectional survey of functional health status, Helicobacter pylori infection, and psychological distress in dyspeptic patients in general practice.

Authors:  A O Quartero; M W Post; M E Numans; R A de Melker; N J de Wit
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Evaluation of a gastrointestinal symptoms questionnaire.

Authors:  H J Bovenschen; M J R Janssen; M G H van Oijen; R J F Laheij; L G M van Rossum; J B M J Jansen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Symptom and health-related quality-of-life measures for use in selected gastrointestinal disease studies: a review and synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  A M Rentz; C Battista; E Trudeau; R Jones; P Robinson; S Sloan; S Mathur; L Frank; D A Revicki
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Upper gastrointestinal symptoms in North America: prevalence and relationship to healthcare utilization and quality of life.

Authors:  L Frank; L Kleinman; D Ganoczy; K McQuaid; S Sloan; A Eggleston; G Tougas; C Farup
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Gender differences in the symptoms and physical and mental well-being of dyspeptics: a population based study.

Authors:  Johanna I Westbrook; Nicholas J Talley; Mary T Westbrook
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.