Literature DB >> 9473064

Review of percutaneous tracheostomy.

D M Powell1, P D Price, L A Forrest.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the four known methods of percutaneous tracheostomy. Perioperative, postoperative, and late complication rates were generated for each method after a complete literature review identified 1684 percutaneous tracheostomy patients reported in 40 series. Two methods, the Toye and the guide wire dilator forceps (GWDF) methods, have been the subject of few investigations. Two other methods have been extensively studied. A high perioperative complication rate was calculated for the Rapitrac method, whereas percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) has complication rates similar to those reported for standard operative tracheostomy. A retrospective review of 22 patients who underwent PDT at a local community hospital confirmed a "learning curve" for this technique that had been previously suggested. Review of the literature suggests that PDT can be safe and cost-effective for selected patients, but a learning curve for this technique exists that dictates caution, experience, and preparation on the part of any surgeon who wishes to add percutaneous tracheostomy to his or her repertoire.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9473064     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199802000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  16 in total

1.  A single-center 8-year experience with percutaneous dilational tracheostomy.

Authors:  P A Kearney; M M Griffen; J B Ochoa; B R Boulanger; B J Tseui; R M Mentzer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Otorhinolaryngological problems occurring within the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Yehudah Roth; Maxim Sokolov; Moshe Adler; Tiberiu Ezry; Moshe Harell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Experience with two different techniques of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in 54 neurosurgical patients.

Authors:  Wolfgang Börm; Markus Gleixner
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy.

Authors:  Patrick Brass; Martin Hellmich; Angelika Ladra; Jürgen Ladra; Anna Wrzosek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-20

5.  Conventional Tracheostomy Versus Percutaneous Tracheostomy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Praveen Kumar Thakur; Anil Kumar Jain; Tahir Ali Khan; Sanyogita Jain
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-04-10

6.  Experience with 224 percutaneous dilatational tracheostomies at an adult intensive care unit in Bahrain: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Akmal A Hameed; Hasan Mohamed; Mariam Al-Ansari
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.219

7.  Comparative study of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy and conventional tracheostomy in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  A Ravi Kumar; Sanjeev Mohanty; K Senthil; M Gopinath
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-07

8.  Guidewire impaction during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.

Authors:  Pramendra Agrawal; Babita Gupta; Nita D'souza; Kapil Dev Soni; Chandni Sinha
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-03

9.  The critical airway in adults: The facts.

Authors:  Fabrizio Giuseppe Bonanno
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2012-04

10.  Issues of critical airway management (Which anesthesia; which surgical airway?).

Authors:  Fabrizio Giuseppe Bonanno
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.