Literature DB >> 9472916

Behavior of transgenic mouse spermatozoa with galline protamine.

M Maleszewski1, S Kuretake, D Evenson, H Yanagimachi, J Bjordahl, R Yanagimachi.   

Abstract

General morphology, physical and chemical stability of nuclei, and postfertilization behavior of spermatozoa from transgenic mice [TgN (Prml Gal) 223 Bri] containing nuclear avian protamine (galline) were compared to those in the spermatozoa of wild-type (Wild) mice. Galline to protamine I ratios in spermatozoal nuclei of transgenic mice, strains 3175 (T75) and 3177 (T77), were 1.94 and 5.62, respectively. Live T75 and T77 spermatozoa were indistinguishable in their gross morphology from Wild spermatozoa. However, unlike Wild and T75 spermatozoa, T77 spermatozoa were vulnerable to mechanical handling, as about 40% of heads and tails were separated after gentle pipetting in suspension. Motility of T77 spermatozoa was markedly inferior to that of T75 and Wild. Chromatin heterogeneity and instability of transgenic spermatozoal nuclei were evident by transmission electron microscopy, staining reaction to Giemsa, and, as apparent by both light microscopy and flow cytometry, reaction to SDS detergent. Wild and T75 spermatozoa fertilized 90% and 60% of zona-intact oocytes in vitro, respectively. T77 spermatozoa completely failed to fertilize and bound to zona surfaces very weakly, and none of them inserted their heads into the zona. Although inefficiently, T77 spermatozoa could fertilize zona-free oocytes in vitro, indicating some ability to undergo capacitation and spontaneous acrosome reaction in vitro. After microsurgical injection into oocytes, the rate of nuclear decondensation was the greatest in rooster spermatozoa, followed by T77, T75, and Wild spermatozoa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9472916     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod58.1.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  6 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal proteins in the spermatogenesis of Drosophila.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hennig
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 2.  A walk though vertebrate and invertebrate protamines.

Authors:  John D Lewis; Yue Song; Miriam E de Jong; Sabira M Bagha; Juan Ausió
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Transgene transmission to progeny by oMt1a-oGH transgenic mice.

Authors:  A D Thomas; J D Murray; A M Oberbauer
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  The correlation of sperm chromatin decondensation following in vitro exposure to heparin and sperm penetration rates.

Authors:  D T Carrell; B R Emery; C M Peterson
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Role of mammalian sperm nuclear structure in fertilization and embryo development.

Authors:  Haruo Katayose; Tomoko Takayama; Shoutarou Hayashi; Akira Sato
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2006-08-09

6.  Interspecific ICSI for the Assessment of Sperm DNA Damage: Technology Report.

Authors:  Jana Rychtarova; Alena Langerova; Helena Fulka; Pasqualino Loi; Michal Benc; Josef Fulka
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.