Literature DB >> 9472636

Use of the comet assay for assessment of drug resistance and its modulation in vivo.

P Huang1, P L Olive, R E Durand.   

Abstract

Drug resistance is generally considered to be a major impediment to successful cancer chemotherapy, yet it is generally not possible to predict the degree or timing of the emergence of tumour resistance in most chemotherapy protocols. Recent developments with the single-cell gel electrophoresis or 'comet' assay for DNA damage at the single-cell level suggest that this technique might provide a method for identifying and potentially monitoring tumour cell responsiveness to many anti-cancer agents in situ. In principle, this assay could be applied to any accessible tumour being treated with chemotherapeutic agents that cause overt DNA damage. We have investigated that supposition using several rodent and human tumour cell lines exhibiting a spectrum of resistance to the DNA strand-breaking drug, etoposide. By assessing cells grown as monolayers, spheroids and xenografted tumours in immunodeficient mice, we found that the comet assay can provide not only an index of sensitivity to etoposide, but, additionally, can demonstrate the efficacy (or lack thereof) of multidrug resistance (MDR) reversing agents for cells in vitro, and tumours in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9472636      PMCID: PMC2151301          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  19 in total

1.  Factors influencing DNA migration from individual cells subjected to gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  P L Olive; D Wlodek; R E Durand; J P Banáth
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the "comet" assay.

Authors:  P L Olive; J P Banáth; R E Durand
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  He's not going to talk about in vitro predictive assays again, is he?

Authors:  D D Von Hoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-01-17       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Radiation response of multicell spheroids--an in vitro tumour model.

Authors:  R M Sutherland; R E Durand
Journal:  Curr Top Radiat Res Q       Date:  1976-01

Review 5.  Current developments in antitumor antibiotics, epipodophyllotoxins, and vinca alkaloids.

Authors:  E K Rowinsky
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 6.  Prediction of response to drug therapy of cancer. A review of in vitro assays.

Authors:  W T Bellamy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Growth fraction measured using the comet assay.

Authors:  P L Olive; J P Banáth
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.831

8.  Gel electrophoresis of individual cells to quantify hypoxic fraction in human breast cancers.

Authors:  P L Olive; R E Durand; J Le Riche; I A Olivotto; S M Jackson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  A Southwest Oncology Group study on the use of a human tumor cloning assay for predicting response in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D D Von Hoff; R Kronmal; S E Salmon; J Turner; J B Green; J S Bonorris; E L Moorhead; H E Hynes; R E Pugh; R J Belt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Co-operative, competitive and non-competitive interactions between modulators of P-glycoprotein.

Authors:  S Ayesh; Y M Shao; W D Stein
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1996-05-24
View more
  1 in total

1.  DNA degradation within mouse brain and dental pulp cells 72 hours postmortem.

Authors:  Jilong Zheng; Xiaona Li; Di Shan; Han Zhang; Dawei Guan
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 5.135

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.