Literature DB >> 9472377

Effect of the introduction of a financial incentive for fee-paying A&E attenders to consult their general practitioner before attending the A&E department.

A W Murphy1, C Leonard, P K Plunkett, G Bury, F Lynam, M Smith, D Gibney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Health (Out-Patient Charges) Regulations 1994 were designed to encourage those Irish patients liable for their own health care costs to attend their GP before their local Accident and Emergency (A&E) department. Such patients are referred to as General Medical Services (GMS)-ineligible. Prior to the introduction of the regulations in March 1994, there was a perverse financial incentive for these patients to attend directly A&E departments instead of their GP.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the number of GMS-ineligible patients referred by a GP during the year before and the year after the implementation of the Regulations.
METHOD: This study involved the audit of all new attendances to a large A&E department, for 1 year before and after the introduction of the new regulations. The main outcome measures were the number of new attenders in the subsequent year, the proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders, the proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders referred by a GP and the proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders referred by a GP and categorized as having neither critical nor urgent complaints.
RESULTS: The total number of new attenders in the year subsequent to the introduction of the regulations was 45,302, an increase of 4.9% on the previous year's total. The proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders decreased from 45.3 to 44% (-1.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.6 to -1.9). The proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders who were referred by a GP increased by 2.4% (95%; CI 1.7-3.1). The proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders, referred by a GP with complaints categorized as neither critical nor urgent, increased by 2.5% (95%; CI 1.8-3.2).
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the regulations was associated with a small, but statistically significant, reduction in the number of GMS-ineligible patients who attended with non-emergency conditions. The proportion of GMS-ineligible attenders who were referred by a GP increased by 2.4% (95%; CI 1.7-3.1). The overall workload of the A&E department was, however, unaffected. Further evaluation of the effects of this reduction on the health status of patients is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9472377     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/14.5.407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  3 in total

Review 1.  Non-emergency department interventions to reduce ED utilization: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sofie Rahman Morgan; Anna Marie Chang; Mahfood Alqatari; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Will alternative immediate care services reduce demands for non-urgent treatment at accident and emergency?

Authors:  P Coleman; R Irons; J Nicholl
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  Effectiveness of organizational interventions to reduce emergency department utilization: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gemma Flores-Mateo; Concepción Violan-Fors; Paloma Carrillo-Santisteve; Salvador Peiró; Josep-Maria Argimon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.