Literature DB >> 9471710

[Complications of silastic implants used in orbital repair].

A Laxenaire1, J Lévy, P Blanchard, J C Lerondeau, F Tesnier, P Scheffer.   

Abstract

Several questions concerning the material to be used for surgical repair of fractures of the orbit are still under debate. Surgeons may choose between autologous or heterologous grafts or different biomaterials. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 137 patients treated in our unit for fractures of the floor of the orbit over the last 20 years who received a silastic implant. After 20 years, the rate of complications requiring removal of the implant was 13.8%. Complications observed were dacryocystitis, implant migration to the skin and the maxillary sinus, skin fistula, persistent diplopia, communication between the orbit and the sinus, periorbit cellulitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9471710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac        ISSN: 0035-1768


  4 in total

Review 1.  A review of materials currently used in orbital floor reconstruction.

Authors:  David Mok; Lucie Lessard; Carlos Cordoba; Patrick G Harris; Andreas Nikolis
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2004

2.  Delayed Periorbital Abscess after Silicone Implant to Orbital Floor Fracture.

Authors:  Raj Dedhia; Travis T Tollefson
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-12-21

3.  Resolution of diplopia after 33 years.

Authors:  D Hammond; N Grew; L Bruzual
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2013-07-23

Review 4.  The Dilemma of Reconstructive Material Choice for Orbital Floor Fracture: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Akash Sivam; Natalie Enninghorst
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.