PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine two different dimensions of an outpatient pediatric tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A) clinical pathway at a tertiary care children's hospital. First, the analysis investigates whether the T&A clinical pathway effectively aids in the decision to discharge a pediatric patient as a day surgery (DS) (less than 12 hours) rather than as an outpatient observation surgery (OPO) (12 to 23 hours). Second, the pathway's impact on quality and financial outcomes is explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty prepathway pediatric T&A patients were randomly selected and matched to 40 pathway pediatric T&A patients by age, gender, medical history, and surgeon to form a retrospective cohort. Using chi-square and analysis of variance, the two groups were compared by type of discharge (DS or OPO), length of stay, readmission rates, and costs. RESULTS: The results show that patients on a pathway were more likely to be discharged as a DS. The shift toward DS discharges effected significant reduction in average length of stay and overall direct costs. Furthermore, there was no difference in readmission rates. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the development and implementation of a pathway is an effective method in reducing length of stay and overall direct costs while maintaining quality outcomes.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to examine two different dimensions of an outpatient pediatric tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (T&A) clinical pathway at a tertiary care children's hospital. First, the analysis investigates whether the T&A clinical pathway effectively aids in the decision to discharge a pediatric patient as a day surgery (DS) (less than 12 hours) rather than as an outpatient observation surgery (OPO) (12 to 23 hours). Second, the pathway's impact on quality and financial outcomes is explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty prepathway pediatric T&A patients were randomly selected and matched to 40 pathway pediatric T&A patients by age, gender, medical history, and surgeon to form a retrospective cohort. Using chi-square and analysis of variance, the two groups were compared by type of discharge (DS or OPO), length of stay, readmission rates, and costs. RESULTS: The results show that patients on a pathway were more likely to be discharged as a DS. The shift toward DS discharges effected significant reduction in average length of stay and overall direct costs. Furthermore, there was no difference in readmission rates. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the development and implementation of a pathway is an effective method in reducing length of stay and overall direct costs while maintaining quality outcomes.
Authors: Thomas Rotter; Leigh Kinsman; Erica James; Andreas Machotta; Ewout W Steyerberg Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Kevin Chorath; Sara Hobday; Neeraj V Suresh; Beatrice Go; Alvaro Moreira; Karthik Rajasekaran Journal: World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2022-04-18