OBJECTIVES: To compare the stability of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) to that of N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (NT-ANP) in whole blood and plasma stored under different conditions. To compare a rapid, simple, direct (unextracted) BNP assay to a conventional assay using plasma extraction. DESIGN: Blinded, prospective, comparative study. SETTING: Tertiary referral cardiology department. SUBJECTS: Forty two subjects (24 men, 18 women) comprising 28 patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) ranging from mild to severe and 14 healthy volunteers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stability of NT-ANP and BNP when stored as whole blood or plasma at room temperature over three days. Reproducibility of measurements. RESULTS: BNP was stable in whole blood stored at room temperature for three days; mean change in concentration -7.4% (95% CI 0.6 to -14.8), (direct), -6.3% (5.0 to -16.4), (extracted); whereas a significant decline in BNP concentration was noted in plasma stored at room temperature; -23.2% (-13.7 to -31.6), (direct); -14.4% (-3.2 to -24.3), (extracted). By contrast a small nonsignificant rise in NT-ANP concentration was noted both in whole blood and plasma stored at room temperature for three days; whole blood +8.6% (+22.3 to -3.5), plasma +6.3%, (23.2 to -8.4). The reproducibility of the BNP measurements, and particularly the rapid, direct, measurement, was superior to that for NT-ANP. CONCLUSIONS: BNP is shown to be stable in whole blood for three days and can be measured using a rapid, simple assay. Routine assay of BNP is feasible in ordinary clinical practice and may be of value to general practitioners and hospital based physicians in the diagnosis and management of patients with LVSD. Samples can be sent to a central laboratory without special handling requirements.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the stability of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) to that of N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (NT-ANP) in whole blood and plasma stored under different conditions. To compare a rapid, simple, direct (unextracted) BNP assay to a conventional assay using plasma extraction. DESIGN: Blinded, prospective, comparative study. SETTING: Tertiary referral cardiology department. SUBJECTS: Forty two subjects (24 men, 18 women) comprising 28 patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) ranging from mild to severe and 14 healthy volunteers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stability of NT-ANP and BNP when stored as whole blood or plasma at room temperature over three days. Reproducibility of measurements. RESULTS:BNP was stable in whole blood stored at room temperature for three days; mean change in concentration -7.4% (95% CI 0.6 to -14.8), (direct), -6.3% (5.0 to -16.4), (extracted); whereas a significant decline in BNP concentration was noted in plasma stored at room temperature; -23.2% (-13.7 to -31.6), (direct); -14.4% (-3.2 to -24.3), (extracted). By contrast a small nonsignificant rise in NT-ANP concentration was noted both in whole blood and plasma stored at room temperature for three days; whole blood +8.6% (+22.3 to -3.5), plasma +6.3%, (23.2 to -8.4). The reproducibility of the BNP measurements, and particularly the rapid, direct, measurement, was superior to that for NT-ANP. CONCLUSIONS:BNP is shown to be stable in whole blood for three days and can be measured using a rapid, simple assay. Routine assay of BNP is feasible in ordinary clinical practice and may be of value to general practitioners and hospital based physicians in the diagnosis and management of patients with LVSD. Samples can be sent to a central laboratory without special handling requirements.
Authors: M Mukoyama; K Nakao; Y Saito; Y Ogawa; K Hosoda; S Suga; G Shirakami; M Jougasaki; H Imura Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1990-09-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Hall; J L Rouleau; L Moyè; J de Champlain; D Bichet; M Klein; B Sussex; M Packer; J Rouleau; M O Arnold Journal: Circulation Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A Lerman; R J Gibbons; R J Rodeheffer; K R Bailey; L J McKinley; D M Heublein; J C Burnett Journal: Lancet Date: 1993-05-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M Davis; E Espiner; G Richards; J Billings; I Town; A Neill; C Drennan; M Richards; J Turner; T Yandle Journal: Lancet Date: 1994-02-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ahmet Fuat; Jeremy J Murphy; A Pali S Hungin; Jane Curry; Ali A Mehrzad; Andrew Hetherington; Jennifer I Johnston; W Stuart A Smellie; Victoria Duffy; Patricia Cawley Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Bong Geun Song; Eun Seok Jeon; Yong Hoon Kim; Min Kyung Kang; Joon Hyung Doh; Phil Ho Kim; Seok Jin Ahn; Hye Lim Oh; Hyun-Joong Kim; Ji Dong Sung; Sang Chol Lee; Hyeon Cheol Gwon; June Soo Kim; Duk-Kyung Kim; Sang Hoon Lee; Kyung Pyo Hong; Jeong Euy Park; Soo Youn Lee; Jong Koo Lee Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.884
Authors: Alexander van Reenen; Mario Berger; Emmanuel Moreau; Edwin Bekx; Tom Bruinink; Danielle Kemper; Lian van Lippen; Jos Weusten; Anita Mrakovic; Etienne Michielsen; Joost Vissers; Femke de Theije; Jeroen Nieuwenhuis; Veronique Semjonow; Johannes Mair Journal: Pract Lab Med Date: 2019-03-17