Literature DB >> 9470839

Phase II study of 21 day schedule oral etoposide in children. New Agents Group of the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG).

A Davidson1, R Gowing, S Lowis, D Newell, I Lewis, C Dicks-Mireaux, C R Pinkerton.   

Abstract

We report a multicentre phase II study of orally administered prolonged schedule etoposide in children with refractory or relapsed malignancy. 83 children were entered into the study. The largest diagnostic groups were neuroblastoma (n = 20), rhabdomyosarcoma/soft tissue sarcoma (n = 16) and brain tumours (n = 16). Etoposide was administered twice daily at a dose of 50 mg/m2/day for 21 days using the intravenous preparation given orally. Disease reassessment was performed after the second course. Etoposide plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC, 2 and 6 h after administration of therapy on days 7 and 14 in 15 patients. 61 patients completed two courses and were evaluable for response. There was 1 complete response (CR), 5 partial responses (PR) 22 stable disease (SD) and 33 progressive disease (PD). Of the 6 with responses, 3 had a diagnosis of medulloblastoma/cerebral primitive neuroectodermal tumour. 24 of 26 patients with SD/PR/CR received further courses with excellent palliative effect. The main toxicity observed was myelosuppression, with 8% and 7% of evaluable courses complicated by grade III-IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Severe infection (grade III-IV) was rare, complicating only 2/94 evaluable courses. Plasma etoposide median concentrations at 2 h after administration on day 7 of course 1 were 1.5 (range 0.6-2.4) micrograms/ml. Total course 1 area under the etoposide plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) values were estimated using a limited sampling model. Grade > or = 2 leucopenia was only observed in patients with a day 72 h etoposide concentration of > 2 micrograms/ml or a course 1 AUC of > 35 mg/ml.min. It is concluded that given at a dose of 50 mg/m2/day in two doses for 21 day courses, oral etoposide is well tolerated in children. A correlation between drug concentrations and toxicity was observed. Overall, a low response rate was seen (approximately 10%), but disease stabilisation appears to occur, and useful palliative effect was frequently noted. The response in brain tumours was more encouraging (3/14 PR) and this group requires further evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9470839     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00201-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  11 in total

1.  Significant response to oral Etoposide in the treatment of an unresectable cardiac sarcoma.

Authors:  Chelsea L Collins; Peter J Bartz; David R Lal; Annette D Segura; Ronald K Woods; Richard L Tower
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.289

Review 2.  Metronomics: towards personalized chemotherapy?

Authors:  Nicolas André; Manon Carré; Eddy Pasquier
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  A Phase II feasibility study of oral etoposide given concurrently with radiotherapy followed by dose intensive adjuvant chemotherapy for children with newly diagnosed high-risk medulloblastoma (protocol POG 9631): A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Adam J Esbenshade; Mehmet Kocak; Linda Hershon; Pierre Rousseau; Jean-Claude Decarie; Susan Shaw; Peter Burger; Henry S Friedman; Amar Gajjar; Albert Moghrabi
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Phase II study of metronomic chemotherapy with bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma after progression on bevacizumab therapy.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Annick Desjardins; Katherine Peters; Sridharan Gururangan; John Sampson; Jeremy N Rich; Roger McLendon; James E Herndon; Jennifer Marcello; Stevie Threatt; Allan H Friedman; James J Vredenburgh; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Metastatic medulloblastoma in 10-year-old girl treated successfully with chemotherapy without radiotherapy.

Authors:  A Schiavetti; G Varrasso; P Maurizi; G Trasimeni; C Carapella; M A Castello
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Old drugs still work! Oral etoposide in a relapsed medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Marta Perez-Somarriba; Maitane Andión; Miguel A López-Pino; Cinzia Lavarino; Luis Madero; Alvaro Lassaletta
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Relapse in medulloblastoma: what can be done after abandoning high-dose chemotherapy? A mono-institutional experience.

Authors:  Maura Massimino; Michela Casanova; Daniela Polastri; Veronica Biassoni; Piergiorgio Modena; Emilia Pecori; Elisabetta Schiavello; Marco Vajna De Pava; Alice Indini; Paolo Rampini; Dario Bauer; Serena Catania; Marta Podda; Lorenza Gandola
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Do pharmacokinetic polymorphisms explain treatment failure in high-risk patients with neuroblastoma?

Authors:  Francesco Bellanti; Bertil Kågedal; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Phase II study of intravenous etoposide in patients with relapsed ependymoma (CNS 2001 04).

Authors:  John R Apps; Shanna Maycock; David W Ellison; Timothy Jaspan; Timothy A Ritzmann; Donald Macarthur; Conor Mallucci; Keith Wheatley; Gareth J Veal; Richard G Grundy; Susan Picton
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.