Literature DB >> 9470825

On the current management of osteosarcoma. A critical evaluation and a proposal for a modified treatment strategy.

O S Bruland1, A Pihl.   

Abstract

The current management of osteosarcoma (OS) is critically reviewed and a modified treatment strategy is put forward for discussion. The overall treatment results in high-grade OS are less impressive than widely assumed. Whereas in 'classical OS' survival has indeed increased during the past decades from approximately 20% to at least 60%, in other subgroups, comprising more than 40% of the entire OS population, the prognosis has been only modestly improved. Today still more than half of an unselected OS population eventually succumbs to the disease despite the current multimodal primary treatments as well as second-line chemotherapy and surgical metastasectomy(ies). Analysis of the reported results indicates that a survival plateau of approximately 60% can be achieved by several different drug combinations. The inclusion of additional drugs and treatment with complex combinations to all patients has not yielded a convincing survival benefit. These expensive regimens overtreat a large number of patients, namely those who could have been cured by the previous less drastic regimens, and it increases the acute and delayed side-effect. Toxic deaths occur and life-threatening side-effects are not infrequent, necessitating interruption of the treatment or reduction in the dose intensity. A possible marginal early survival benefit may well be offset by late side-effects. For the above reasons, we propose an alternative, risk-adapted, treatment strategy, to retain the present results at a lower price in terms of acute toxicity and late morbidity. It is suggested that all patients with classical OS should be treated pre-operatively with optimal doses of only the two most active agents, methotrexate and doxorubicin. This presumably is sufficient in the majority of these patients. The most toxic treatment involving additional anticancer agents should be reserved for high-risk and relapsing patients, i.e. for situations where drastic measures are necessary and warranted. An important consideration is that relapsing patients are likely to benefit in particular from drugs to which they have not been previously exposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9470825     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00252-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  39 in total

1.  Osteosarcoma in children 5 years of age or younger at initial diagnosis.

Authors:  Jennifer Worch; Katherine K Matthay; John Neuhaus; Robert Goldsby; Steven G DuBois
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Corruption of the Fas pathway delays the pulmonary clearance of murine osteosarcoma cells, enhances their metastatic potential, and reduces the effect of aerosol gemcitabine.

Authors:  Nancy Gordon; Nadezhda V Koshkina; Shu-Fang Jia; Chand Khanna; Arnulfo Mendoza; Laura L Worth; Eugenie S Kleinerman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Pharmacogenomics of second-line drugs used for treatment of unresponsive or relapsed osteosarcoma patients.

Authors:  Claudia M Hattinger; Serena Vella; Elisa Tavanti; Marilù Fanelli; Piero Picci; Massimo Serra
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 4.  The pharmacogenomics of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  M Serra; C M Hattinger
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.550

5.  Antioxidants inhibit TNFalpha-induced motility and invasion of human osteosarcoma cells: possible involvement of NFkappaB activation.

Authors:  K Harimaya; K Tanaka; Y Matsumoto; H Sato; S Matsuda; Y Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Breed-specific incidence rates of canine primary bone tumors--a population based survey of dogs in Norway.

Authors:  Kristin P Anfinsen; Tom Grotmol; Oyvind S Bruland; Thora J Jonasdottir
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.310

7.  Inhibition of AP-1 transcriptional activity blocks the migration, invasion, and experimental metastasis of murine osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Virna D Leaner; Jeffrey F Chick; Howard Donninger; Ilona Linniola; Arnulfo Mendoza; Chand Khanna; Michael J Birrer
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Axial skeletal osteosarcoma: a 25-year monoinstitutional experience in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Cristina Meazza; Roberto Luksch; Primo Daolio; Marta Podda; Alessandro Luzzati; Alessandro Gronchi; Antonina Parafioriti; Lorenza Gandola; Paola Collini; Andrea Ferrari; Michela Casanova; Monica Terenziani; Filippo Spreafico; Daniela Polastri; Veronica Biassoni; Elisabetta Schiavello; Emilia Pecori; Maura Massimino
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Human osteosarcoma xenografts and their sensitivity to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Skjalg Bruheim; Oyvind S Bruland; Knut Breistol; Gunhild M Maelandsmo; Oystein Fodstad
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2004-09-25       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  (18)F and (18)FDG PET imaging of osteosarcoma to non-invasively monitor in situ changes in cellular proliferation and bone differentiation upon MYC inactivation.

Authors:  Constadina Arvanitis; Pavan K Bendapudi; Jeffrey R Tseng; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 4.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.