Literature DB >> 9469857

Comparative Toxicity of Chlordane, Chlorpyrifos, and Aldicarb to Four Aquatic Testing Organisms

.   

Abstract

Laboratory toxicity data contrasting responses of aquatic organisms to insecticides are important for focusing on sensitive species (steepest exposure-response slope) exposed to aqueous concentrations of these insecticides in field studies. These data also allow prediction of expected responses of aquatic species to a range of insecticide concentrations in situ. Aqueous 48-h toxicity tests were performed to contrast responses of Daphnia magna Straus, Hyalella azteca Saussure, Chironomus tentans Fabricius, and Pimephales promelas Rafinesque to acetylcholinesterase-inhibiting insecticides: chlorpyrifos, aldicarb, and chlordane. As expected, invertebrates tested (H. azteca, C. tentans, and D. magna) were >/= 200 times more sensitive than the vertebrate P. promelas to chlorpyrifos exposures. H. azteca was approximately 3.5 times more sensitive to chlorpyrifos (453% mortality/&mgr;g/L) than D. magna (128% mortality/&mgr;g/L). For both aldicarb and chlordane, C. tentans was the most sensitive species tested (2.44 and 2.54% mortality/&mgr;g/L, respectively). Differences in chlordane potency for test species varied only by a factor of approximately 2-3 (0.88% mortality/&mgr;g/L for H. azteca to 2.54% mortality/&mgr;g/L for C. tentans). Although point estimates of population responses such as LC50s, NOECs, and LOECs are of some utility for predicting effects of pesticides in aquatic systems, exposure-response slopes are also useful for extrapolation of laboratory data to diverse field situations, especially where sediment sorption may regulate insecticide exposure or bioavailability.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9469857     DOI: 10.1007/s002449900299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  5 in total

1.  Effects of a mixture of two insecticides in freshwater microcosms: II. Responses of plankton and ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Paul J Van den Brink; Elizabeth M Hartgers; Ronald Gylstra; Fred Bransen; Theo C M Brock
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Impairment of trophic interactions between zebrafish (Danio rerio) and midge larvae (Chironomus riparius) by chlorpyrifos.

Authors:  Miriam Langer-Jaesrich; Cornelia Kienle; Heinz-R Köhler; Almut Gerhardt
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Wetland defense: naturally occurring pesticide resistance in zooplankton populations protects the stability of aquatic communities.

Authors:  Randall J Bendis; Rick A Relyea
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Predator-prey imbalances due to a pesticide: density and applicability timing as determining factors for experimental assessments.

Authors:  María Florencia Gutierrez; Carlos Leandro Negro
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Variation in toxicity of a current-use insecticide among resurrected Daphnia pulicaria genotypes.

Authors:  Adam M Simpson; Punidan D Jeyasingh; Jason B Belden
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 2.823

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.