Literature DB >> 9469526

Psychological approaches during conscious sedation. Hypnosis versus stress reducing strategies: a prospective randomized study.

E M Faymonville1, H P Mambourg, J Joris, B Vrijens, J Fissette, A Albert, M Lamy.   

Abstract

Stress reducing strategies are useful in patients undergoing surgery. Hypnosis is also known to alleviate acute and chronic pain. We therefore compared the effectiveness of these two psychological approaches for reducing perioperative discomfort during conscious sedation for plastic surgery. Sixty patients scheduled for elective plastic surgery under local anesthesia and intravenous sedation (midazolam and alfentanil upon request) were included in the study after providing informed consent. They were randomly allocated to either stress reducing strategies (control: CONT) or hypnosis (HYP) during the entire surgical procedure. Both techniques were performed by the same anesthesiologist (MEF). Patient behavior was noted during surgery by a psychologist, the patient noted anxiety, pain, perceived control before, during and after surgery, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Patient satisfaction and surgical conditions were also recorded. Peri- and postoperative anxiety and pain were significantly lower in the HYP group. This reduction in anxiety and pain were achieved despite a significant reduction in intraoperative requirements for midazolam and alfentanil in the HYP group (alfentanil: 8.7 +/- 0.9 microg kg(-1)/h(-1) vs. 19.4 +/- 2 microg kg(-1)/h(-1), P < 0.001; midazolam: 0.04 +/- 0.003 mg kg(-1)/h(-1) vs. 0.09 +/- 0.01 mg kg(-1)/h(-1), P < 0.001). Patients in the HYP group reported an impression of more intraoperative control than those in the CONT group (P < 0.01). PONV were significantly reduced in the HYP group (6.5% vs. 30.8%, P < 0.001). Surgical conditions were better in the HYP group. Less signs of patient discomfort and pain were observed by the psychologist in the HYP group (P < 0.001). Vital signs were significantly more stable in the HYP group. Patient satisfaction score was significantly higher in the HYP group (P < 0.004). This study suggests that hypnosis provides better perioperative pain and anxiety relief, allows for significant reductions in alfentanil and midazolam requirements, and improves patient satisfaction and surgical conditions as compared with conventional stress reducing strategies support in patients receiving conscious sedation for plastic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9469526     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00122-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  21 in total

Review 1.  The Efficacy, Safety and Applications of Medical Hypnosis.

Authors:  Winfried Häuser; Maria Hagl; Albrecht Schmierer; Ernil Hansen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  [Negative and positive suggestions in anaesthesia : Improved communication with anxious surgical patients].

Authors:  E Hansen; C Bejenke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Bilateral neck exploration under hypnosedation: a new standard of care in primary hyperparathyroidism?

Authors:  M Meurisse; E Hamoir; T Defechereux; L Gollogly; O Derry; A Postal; J Joris; M E Faymonville
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  [Communication with children: practical hints and tools for the anesthesiology routine].

Authors:  N Zech; M Seemann; S Signer-Fischer; E Hansen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  THE EFFICACY OF HYPNOTIC ANALGESIA IN ADULTS: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

Authors:  Brenda L Stoelb; Ivan R Molton; Mark P Jensen; David R Patterson
Journal:  Contemp Hypn       Date:  2009-03-01

6.  Enhancement of suggestibility and imaginative ability with nitrous oxide.

Authors:  M G Whalley; G B Brooks
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Hypnosis for Acute Procedural Pain: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Cassie Kendrick; Jim Sliwinski; Yimin Yu; Aimee Johnson; William Fisher; Zoltán Kekecs; Gary Elkins
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Hypn       Date:  2016

8.  Beneficial effects of hypnosis and adverse effects of empathic attention during percutaneous tumor treatment: when being nice does not suffice.

Authors:  Elvira V Lang; Kevin S Berbaum; Stephen G Pauker; Salomao Faintuch; Gloria M Salazar; Susan Lutgendorf; Eleanor Laser; Henrietta Logan; David Spiegel
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  HYPNOSIS TO MANAGE DISTRESS RELATED TO MEDICAL PROCEDURES: A META-ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Julie B Schnur; Ilana Kafer; Carolyn Marcus; Guy H Montgomery
Journal:  Contemp Hypn       Date:  2008-08-21

10.  Pain in Times of Stress.

Authors:  Asma Hayati Ahmad; Rahimah Zakaria
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.