Literature DB >> 9469140

What factors influence primary care physicians' charges for their services? An exploratory study using standardized patients.

C A Woodward1, B Hutchison, G R Norman, J A Brown, J Abelson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of variation in physicians' charges for health care encounters with unannounced standardized patients and factors associated with the variation.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Family practices open to new patients within 1 hour's drive of Hamilton, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: A stratified random sample of 125 physicians who had responded to an earlier survey regarding preventive care were invited to participate. Of the 125, 44 (35.2%) declined to participate, and an additional 19 (15.2%) initially consented but later withdrew because they closed their practices to new patients. Sixty-two physicians thus participated in the study. INTERVENTION: Unannounced standardized patients posing as new patients to the practice visited study physicians' practices between September 1994 and August 1995, portraying 4 scenarios: 28-year-old woman, 52-year-old woman, 48-year-old man and 70-year-old man. OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician characteristics, encounter characteristics and charges made for services.
RESULTS: The 62 physicians had 246 encounters with the standardized patients. Charges were made to the health insurance plan for services by 59 physicians for up to 4 encounters (215 encounters in all). Charges varied considerably both within and across patient scenarios. Time spent with the patient was an important factor predicting charges made (p < 0.01), although the effect of time spent on charges varied across scenarios (p < 0.01). Fee-for-service physicians charged more for their services than physicians who usually had alternative billing arrangements (p < 0.01). Female physicians charged more for their services than their male colleagues (p = 0.03). No relation was found between quality of preventive care and charges made (p = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Physician-related factors are better able to account for the variability in charges for their services than patient-related factors. Physicians seeing comparable patients may earn much more or less than their colleagues because of differences in the services they provide and the way they apply the fee schedule. Quality-assurance techniques are likely needed to reduce the variability in charges seen and increase value for money spent in health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9469140      PMCID: PMC1232692     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  12 in total

1.  Using unannounced simulated patients to evaluate sexual risk assessment and risk reduction skills of practicing physicians.

Authors:  N K Russell; B O Boekeloo; I Z Rafi; D L Rabin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  General practitioners and psychosocial problems: An evaluation using pseudopatients.

Authors:  A Owen; R Winkler
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1974-09-14       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Are hospital services rationed in New Haven or over-utilised in Boston?

Authors:  J E Wennberg; J L Freeman; W J Culp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-23       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Perception of the need for removal of impacted third molars by general dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons.

Authors:  H M Hazelkorn; M D Macek
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Measurement of physician performance by standardized patients. Refining techniques for undetected entry in physicians' offices.

Authors:  C A Woodward; G A McConvey; V Neufeld; G R Norman; A Walsh
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  A comparison of dental treatment plans under different reimbursement systems.

Authors:  H M Hazelkorn
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.222

7.  Measuring physicians' performances by using simulated patients.

Authors:  G R Norman; V R Neufeld; A Walsh; C A Woodward; G A McConvey
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1985-12

8.  Factors affecting the incomes of men and women physicians: further explorations.

Authors:  K M Langwell
Journal:  J Hum Resour       Date:  1982

9.  Practice settings and prescribing profiles: the simulation of tension headaches to general practitioners working in different practice settings in the Montreal area.

Authors:  M Renaud; J Beauchemin; C Lalonde; H Poirier; S Berthiaume
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The periodic health examination provided to asymptomatic older women: an assessment using standardized patients.

Authors:  P A Carney; A J Dietrich; D H Freeman; L A Mott
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  3 in total

1.  Caught in the act? Prevalence, predictors, and consequences of physician detection of unannounced standardized patients.

Authors:  Carol E Franz; Ron Epstein; Katherine N Miller; Arthur Brown; Jun Song; Mitchell Feldman; Peter Franks; Steven Kelly-Reif; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Information Asymmetry in Hospitals: Evidence of the Lack of Cost Awareness in Clinicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Fabes; Tuba Saygın Avşar; Jonathan Spiro; Thomas Fernandez; Helge Eilers; Steve Evans; Amelia Hessheimer; Paula Lorgelly; Michael Spiro
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Cost-consciousness among Swiss doctors: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Patrick A Bovier; Diane P Martin; Thomas V Perneger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.