Literature DB >> 9468419

A prospective randomized trial comparing the use of the flexible gastroscope versus the bronchoscope in the management of foreign body ingestion.

K M Chu1, H K Choi, H H Tuen, S Y Law, F J Branicki, J Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Foreign body ingestion is a common clinical problem in Hong Kong. Some recent reports have proposed the use of flexible nasoendoscopy for foreign body retrieval. The present study is a prospective randomized trial on the use of the flexible gastroscope and bronchoscope in the management of foreign body ingestion.
METHODS: Two hundred sixteen patients older than 11 years were prospectively randomized to flexible endoscopic examination using either the gastroscope (108 patients) or the bronchoscope (108 patients). The duration of the procedure was noted. Patients were asked to assess their overall tolerance to the procedure on a scale of 1 (well tolerated) to 10 (unacceptable).
RESULTS: A foreign body was retrieved in 68 patients (31.5%). There was no difference between the two groups in the foreign body retrieval rate, type of foreign body retrieved, duration of procedure, and tolerance level. In the group managed with the bronchoscope, however, three patients required the additional use of the gastroscope for foreign body retrieval at (for one patient) or below (for two patients) the cricopharyngeus. The patient's tolerance level was related only to the duration of procedure (rho = 0.386; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The use of the flexible gastroscope is recommended because of its efficacy, safety, and tolerability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9468419     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70294-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic management of complicated foreign body ingestion: a case series.

Authors:  Daryl K A Chia; Ramesh Wijaya; Andrew Wong; Su-Ming Tan
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-05

2.  Small-bowel perforation caused by fish bone.

Authors:  Sheng-Der Hsu; De-Chuan Chan; Yao-Chi Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Intestinal perforation secondary to ingested foreign bodies: a single-center experience with 38 cases.

Authors:  Xiao-Kun Lin; Da-Zhou Wu; Xiao-Fang Lin; Na Zheng
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  A prospective analysis of 3525 esophagogastroduodenoscopies performed by surgeons.

Authors:  W P Reed; J W Kilkenny; C E Dias; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Small bowel perforation due to fish bone: A case report.

Authors:  Huseyin Pulat; Oktay Karakose; Mehmet Fatih Benzin; Seyma Benzin; Recep Cetin
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-01-14

Review 6.  Endoscopic Management of Foreign Bodies in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract: An Evidence-Based Review Article.

Authors:  Pedro Magalhães-Costa; Liliana Carvalho; José Pedro Rodrigues; Maria Ana Túlio; Susana Marques; Joana Carmo; Miguel Bispo; Cristina Chagas
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-23

7.  Development of an abdominal wall abscess caused by fish bone ingestion: a case report.

Authors:  Kiyomitsu Kuwahara; Yasuji Mokuno; Hideo Matsubara; Hirokazu Kaneko; Mikihiro Shamoto; Shinsuke Iyomasa
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2019-12-15

8.  Is naso-pharyngeal swab always safe for SARS-CoV-2 testing? An unusual, accidental foreign body swallowing.

Authors:  Luca De Luca; Stefania Maltoni
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.