Literature DB >> 9468041

Adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis and transposon mutant strains to hydrophobic polyethylene.

J M Higashi1, I W Wang, D M Shlaes, J M Anderson, R E Marchant.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus epidermidis capsular polysaccharide adhesin (PS/A) and slime were studied as possible mediators of bacterial adhesion to NHLBI polyethylene (PE) under dynamic flow. This putative interaction was examined by quantifying the adhesion of M187 (PS/A+, slime+) parent strain and isogenic transposon mutant strain sn3 (PS/A-, slime-) to polyethylene (PE) under a range of physiologic shear stress conditions in both phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 1% platelet poor plasma (PPP). No significant differences in adhesion were noted between the M187 and sn3 strains in either test medium. However, adhesion of both strains in 1% PPP was decreased 75-95% compared to adhesion in PBS. In PBS, adhesion was shear stress dependent from 0-15 dyne/cm2, after which adhesion was comparatively shear stress independent. Adhesion in 1% PPP was independent of shear stress. Epifluorescent imaging of both strains labeled for slime confirmed the presence of slime on the surface of M187 and suggested that PS/A and slime promote the formation of large aggregates, as aggregates were totally absent in the images of the sn3 strain. The results suggest that PS/A and slime do not mediate S. epidermidis adhesion to bare PE or PE with adsorbed plasma proteins, but may be necessary for intercellular adhesion, which is important for biofilm formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9468041     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(19980305)39:3<341::aid-jbm1>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  5 in total

Review 1.  Strategic Moves of "Superbugs" Against Available Chemical Scaffolds: Signaling, Regulation, and Challenges.

Authors:  Bikash Baral; M R Mozafari
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-04-13

2.  Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A adhesion to chemically modified cellulose derivatives.

Authors:  A P Fonseca; P L Granja; J A Nogueira; D R Oliveira; M A Barbosa
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  LapF and Its Regulation by Fis Affect the Cell Surface Hydrophobicity of Pseudomonas putida.

Authors:  Andrio Lahesaare; Hanna Ainelo; Annika Teppo; Maia Kivisaar; Hermann J Heipieper; Riho Teras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Antibiotic-loaded cement in orthopedic surgery: a review.

Authors:  Alessandro Bistolfi; Giuseppe Massazza; Enrica Verné; Alessandro Massè; Davide Deledda; Sara Ferraris; Marta Miola; Fabrizio Galetto; Maurizio Crova
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2011-08-07

Review 5.  How microorganisms use hydrophobicity and what does this mean for human needs?

Authors:  Anna Krasowska; Karel Sigler
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 5.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.