Literature DB >> 9467758

Instructed faking and MMPI-2 response latencies: the potential for assessing response validity.

D G Brunetti1, R S Schlottmann, A B Scott, J L Mihura, J L Hollrah.   

Abstract

Differences in Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) response latencies between groups instructed to respond honestly or fake were explored. There were 120 undergraduate students who completed a computer administered MMPI-2 with instructions to either respond honestly, to underreport psychopathology, or to overreport psychopathology. Results showed that subjects required significantly more time to respond in a manner that was inconsistent with their response set when pattern of endorsement (acceptance vs. rejection) was considered and less time when pattern of endorsement was not considered. The differential response of subjects across groups suggests that response latencies are related to response styles and that future research may indicate a methodology for utilizing response latencies in assessing response validity.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9467758     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199802)54:2<143::aid-jclp3>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9762


  2 in total

1.  Could Time Detect a Faking-Good Attitude? A Study With the MMPI-2-RF.

Authors:  Paolo Roma; Maria C Verrocchio; Cristina Mazza; Daniela Marchetti; Franco Burla; Maria E Cinti; Stefano Ferracuti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-25

2.  Challenging response latencies in faking detection: The case of few items and no warnings.

Authors:  Jessica Röhner; Ronald R Holden
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.