Literature DB >> 9467144

Physical activity for the over-65s: could it be a cost-effective exercise for the NHS?

J Munro1, J Brazier, R Davey, J Nicholl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in the health-promoting potential of physical activity in older adults. The objective of this study was to estimate the likely costs, health benefits and consequences for the National Health Service which might result from a publicly funded programme of regular exercise made available to a population of 10,000 people over the age of 65.
METHODS: Risk education data from observational studies were used to calculate the possible impact of a community-based programme of activity on hospital admissions and deaths from coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, femoral neck fractures and mental disorders. The avoided costs of health care and net cost per life-year saved were estimated.
RESULTS: Providing twice-weekly exercise classes for 10,000 participants would cost approximately 854,700 pounds per year, but would prevent 76 deaths and 230 in-patient episodes, avoiding annual health care costs of approximately 601,000 pounds. Assuming the mean expectation of life after 65 to be ten years, the programme would cost about 330 pounds per life-year saved. Under a range of more extreme assumptions, the cost per life-year saved would vary from 100 pounds to 1500 pounds.
CONCLUSIONS: A publicly funded programme of regular moderate exercise for over-65-year-olds could achieve important health benefits at relatively low cost. The estimates provided by this analysis should now be tested in a rigorous randomized trial, and health commissioners should begin to think of purchasing exercise programmes alongside other health-promoting measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9467144     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  12 in total

1.  How much does self-reported health status, measured by the SF-36, vary between electoral wards with different Jarman and Townsend scores?

Authors:  P Marsh; R Carlisle; A J Avery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Collaborative team-based health promotion in a primary care setting: The MOVE program.

Authors:  Douglas Klein; Matt Kallio; Serena Humphries; Madiha Mueen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Cost-effectiveness implications of GP intervention to promote physical activity: evidence from Perth, Australia.

Authors:  Anura K Amarasinghe
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2010-05-13

Review 4.  Economic evaluation of lifestyle interventions for preventing diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Sanjib Saha; Ulf-G Gerdtham; Pia Johansson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The Victorian Active Script Programme: promising signs for general practitioners, population health, and the promotion of physical activity.

Authors:  N Huang; J Pietsch; L Naccarella; J Sims
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Healthcare cost differences with participation in a community-based group physical activity benefit for medicare managed care health plan members.

Authors:  Ronald T Ackermann; Barbara Williams; Huong Q Nguyen; Ethan M Berke; Matthew L Maciejewski; James P LoGerfo
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Applying economic evaluation to public health interventions: the case of interventions to promote physical activity.

Authors:  Paul Trueman; Nana Kwame Anokye
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.341

8.  Is brief advice in primary care a cost-effective way to promote physical activity?

Authors:  Nana K Anokye; Joanne Lord; Julia Fox-Rushby
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Physical activity, sedentary time and physical capability in early old age: British birth cohort study.

Authors:  Andrew J M Cooper; Rebecca K Simmons; Diana Kuh; Soren Brage; Rachel Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cost-utility of a walking programme for moderately depressed, obese, or overweight elderly women in primary care: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Narcis Gusi; Maria C Reyes; Jose L Gonzalez-Guerrero; Emilio Herrera; Jose M Garcia
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.