Literature DB >> 9467050

Considerations in assigning dose based on uncertainties from in vivo counting.

G H Kramer1.   

Abstract

Lung counting is highly geometry dependent, especially at low photon energies. Monte Carlo simulations have been used to determine the magnitude of the errors obtained if it is assumed that the deposition is homogeneous, when in fact it is not. Simulation for a germanium lung counting system consisting of four, 70 mm x 30 mm diameter thick detectors have been performed for 70 deposition patterns. The detector efficiencies for 20, 40, 60, 120, 240, 660, and 1000 kiloelectron volts were calculated for a homogeneous deposition and these efficiencies were used to estimate the bias when the deposition was heterogeneous. A bias of 800% was not unusual. Whole-body counting is prone to errors that can arise from the activity distribution and/or size of the subject. The latter are geometry dependent and, for example, a bias result of 200% can be obtained when measuring children in a chair geometry using a calibration factor based on reference man. Thyroid counting is the least prone to error. If the measurement is done correctly, biases can usually be kept below 20%. However, if the measurement is made with a collimator or if the detector is in contact with the subject's neck, biases exceeding 200% can be obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9467050      PMCID: PMC1469955          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.97105s61393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  6 in total

1.  The Canadian National Calibration Reference Centre for In-Vivo Monitoring. Part II: Sources of errors in thyroid monitoring of occupationally exposed personnel.

Authors:  G H Kramer; D P Meyerhof
Journal:  Can J Med Radiat Technol       Date:  1994-03

2.  The Canadian National Calibration Reference Centre for In-Vivo Monitoring: thyroid monitoring. Part V: Minimizing placement error in a thyroid monitoring system.

Authors:  G H Kramer; D P Meyerhof
Journal:  Can J Med Radiat Technol       Date:  1994-10

3.  The Canadian National Calibration Reference Center for Bioassay and in-vivo Monitoring: a program summary.

Authors:  G H Kramer; M L Zamora
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  The Canadian whole body counting intercomparison program: a summary report for 1989-1993.

Authors:  G H Kramer
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  The BRMD BOMAB phantom family.

Authors:  G H Kramer; L Burns; L Noel
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Comparison of the ANSI, RSD, KKH, and BRMD thyroid-neck phantoms for 125I thyroid monitoring.

Authors:  G H Kramer; G Olender; S Vlahovich; B M Hauck; D P Meyerhof
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.316

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.