Literature DB >> 9466141

A comparison of economic modelling and clinical trials in the economic evaluation of cholesterol-modifying pharmacotherapy.

S Morris1.   

Abstract

There are various ways in which data for economic evaluations may be obtained, including via clinical trials and via economic modelling. There are numerous advantages and disadvantages associated with each method, although it is generally assumed that economic models lack the accuracy required for the calculation of meaningful cost-effectiveness data. In order to assess the predictive accuracy of economic modeling in the context of cholesterol-modifying pharmacotherapy it is possible to compare predicted coronary heart disease (CHD) incidence estimates obtained using CHD risk equations derived from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) with actual CHD incidence rates achieved in a major clinical trial, the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS). FHS-derived CHD risk equations substantially underestimate the actual risks of nonfatal myocardial infarction obtained by WOSCOPS. However, in predicting risks of death from CHD, FHS-derived CHD risk equations estimate extremely accurately the incidence obtained by WOSCOPS. For example, from WOSCOPS the risk of an individual fulfilling the trial entry criteria incurring nonfatal myocardial infarction or CHD death in 4.9 years is 0.079 for placebo group and 0.055 for the intervention group. Therefore, the relative risk for the intervention group relative to placebo group is 0.696, implying a risk reduction of 30%. Comparable risks predicted using FHS-derived CHD risk equations are 0.116 for the placebo group and 0.088 for the intervention group. Consequent relative risks and risk reductions for the intervention relative to placebo are 0.757 and 24%, respectively. Using both model and trial estimates of CHD incidence in an economic evaluation of cholesterol-modifying pharmacotherapy, incremental costs per life year gained are 41,707 Pounds using WOSCOPS data and 36,480 Pounds using FHS-derived CHD risk equations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9466141     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199711)6:6<589::aid-hec286>3.0.co;2-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  9 in total

Review 1.  Real world designs in economic evaluation. Bridging the gap between clinical research and policy-making.

Authors:  R Baltussen; R Leidl; A Ament
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Clinical trials in orthopaedics research. Part III. Overcoming operational challenges in the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Elena Losina; James Wright; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Cost effectiveness of statins in coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Oscar H Franco; Anna Peeters; Caspar W N Looman; Luc Bonneux
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Choice of cost-effectiveness measure in the economic evaluation of cholesterol-modifying pharmacotherapy. An illustrative example focusing on the primary prevention of coronary heart disease in Canada.

Authors:  S Morris; E Godber
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Pravastatin. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  A J Coukell; M I Wilde
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Key analytic considerations in design, analysis, and reporting of randomized controlled trials in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  E Losina; J Ranstam; J E Collins; T J Schnitzer; J N Katz
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments to reduce cholesterol levels, blood pressure and smoking for the prevention of coronary heart disease: evaluative study carried out in Spain.

Authors:  P Plans-Rubió
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Cost-Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Alcohol and Cannabis Use Among Patients With Depression.

Authors:  Derek D Satre; Sujaya Parthasarathy; Kelly C Young-Wolff; Meredith C Meacham; Brian Borsari; Matthew E Hirschtritt; Lucas Van Dyke; Stacy A Sterling
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Systematic Review of Validity Assessments of Framingham Risk Score Results in Health Economic Modelling of Lipid-Modifying Therapies in Europe.

Authors:  Jonas Hermansson; Thomas Kahan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.981

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.