Literature DB >> 9466046

Factors affecting participation in a mammography screening program among members of an urban Detroit health maintenance organization.

M S Simon1, P A Gimotty, J Coombs, S McBride, A Moncrease, R C Burack.   

Abstract

Breast cancer mortality rates remain disproportionately high among black women despite recent improvements in mammography screening utilization. We conducted a telephone survey among a sample of women (N = 202) participating in a randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of a mammography reminder letter that was one component of a breast cancer control intervention strategy. The objectives of the survey were to ascertain the extent to which the letter reminder was received and acted upon, and to determine attitudes and breast cancer control practices in the target population. The study was conducted among members of a large health maintenance organization serving predominantly black women in Detroit, Michigan. Forty-eight percent of the participants completed a mammogram during the year after the letter was sent. While 72% of the women remembered receiving the letter reminder, only 5% responded to the recommendations in the letter. Important predictors of mammography completion included past mammogram utilization (OR: 2.49; 95% CI: 1.05-5.93), a prior physician recommendation for a mammogram (OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.00-3.95) and subject's knowledge of her primary physician's name (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 0.91-4.60). Letter reminders promoting primary care visits were relatively ineffective since few women reported being prompted by the letter recommendation. Strategies which target physician mammography referral behavior may have an important impact on mammography utilization among inner-city women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9466046     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1500.1998.00009.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  6 in total

1.  Health insurance and mammography: would a Medicare buy-in take us to universal screening?

Authors:  Donald H Taylor; Lynn Van Scoyoc; Sarah Tropman Hawley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Psychological benefits of prostate cancer screening: the role of reassurance.

Authors:  Scott B Cantor; Robert J Volk; Alvah R Cass; Jawaria Gilani; Stephen J Spann
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Patient education for informed decision making about prostate cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Stephen J Spann; Alvab R Cass; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Breast and colorectal cancer risk communication approaches with low-income African-American and Hispanic women: implications for healthcare providers.

Authors:  Renee Royak-Schaler; Deborah E Blocker; Ann Marie Yali; Monica Bynoe; Katherine Josa Briant; Shannon Smith
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Identifying geographic disparities in the early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system.

Authors:  Jane A McElroy; Patrick L Remington; Ronald E Gangnon; Luxme Hariharan; LeAnn D Andersen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Organized screening programmes for breast and cervical cancer in 17 EU countries: trajectories of attendance rates.

Authors:  Maria Michela Gianino; Jacopo Lenzi; Marco Bonaudo; Maria Pia Fantini; Roberta Siliquini; Walter Ricciardi; Gianfranco Damiani
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.