Literature DB >> 9465753

Use of pentastarch solution in the treatment of patients with hemorrhagic hypovolemia: randomized phase II study in the emergency room.

R N Younes1, K C Yin, C J Amino, M Itinoshe, M Rocha e Silva, D Birolini.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the hemodynamic effects of the administration of 10% pentastarch solution (PS) during the initial treatment of hypovolemia in trauma patients. This prospective randomized phase II study included trauma patients admitted to the emergency room with hemorrhagic hypovolemia: systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg. Upon admission, the patients were randomized to receive 10% PS (n = 12) or isotonic 0.9% NaCl solution (IS) (n = 11), infused intravenously in 250-ml boluses, repeated until SBP > 100 mmHg. Blood pressure, infused volumes necessary to maintain SBP, and overall survival rates were determined and compared between groups. SBP increased significantly following either IS (from 64.4 +/- 9.2 mmHg to 111.1 +/- 6.3 mmHg), or PS (from 63.7 +/- 10.6 mmHg to 108.1 +/- 9.8 mmHg) when compared to admission values (p < 0.05). Endovenous volumes infused were greater (p = 0.001) in IS patients (1420 +/- 298 ml) than in PS patients (356 +/- 64 ml). No blood was transfused into PS patients, compared to 370 +/- 140 ml of red blood cells transfused into IS patients (p = 0.015). Mortality rates were similar in the two groups (p = 0.725). We concluded that PS is a safe, efficient method for inducing hemodynamic recovery of hypovolemic trauma patients, with a clear reduction in the intravenous volumes required for acute resuscitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9465753     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  8 in total

Review 1.  Colloid solutions: a clinical update.

Authors:  Tomi T Niemi; Ryo Miyashita; Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Cardiopulmonary monitoring of shock.

Authors:  James Simmons; Corey E Ventetuolo
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.687

3.  Renal outcomes and mortality following hydroxyethyl starch resuscitation of critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials: ATTENTION: The analysis and conclusions of this article are being revised by the authors. This is due to the journal Anesthesia and Analgesia's retraction of a paper by Dr. Joachim Boldt, an author in seven of the studies analyzed in this review. As such, the editors of Open Medicine recommend interpreting this review with extreme caution until Zarychanski et al. publish a new analysis and interpretation in Open Medicine. For more information, see Anesthesia and Analgesia's press release.

Authors:  Ryan Zarychanski; Alexis F Turgeon; Dean A Fergusson; Deborah J Cook; Paul Hébert; Sean M Bagshaw; Danny Monsour; Lauralyn McIntyre
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2009-10-27

Review 4.  Salt of the earth or a drop in the ocean? A pathophysiological approach to fluid resuscitation.

Authors:  P Gosling
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  The acute management of trauma hemorrhage: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Nicola Curry; Sally Hopewell; Carolyn Dorée; Chris Hyde; Karim Brohi; Simon Stanworth
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Michael W Pritchard; David Jw Evans; Andrew R Butler; Phil Alderson; Andrew F Smith; Ian Roberts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Effect of fluid loading with normal saline and 6% hydroxyethyl starch on stroke volume variability and left ventricular volume.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Kanda; Yuji Hirasaki; Takafumi Iida; Megumi Kanao; Yuki Toyama; Takayuki Kunisawa; Hiroshi Iwasaki
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2015-09-29

8.  Fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Zhi Mao; Pan Hu; Xin Hu; Hongjun Kang; Jie Hu; Zhifang Yang; Penglin Ma; Feihu Zhou
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.423

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.