Literature DB >> 9465379

[Patient-centered evaluation of illness outcome in musculoskeletal diseases: selection and testing of outcome instruments].

G Stucki1, S Stucki, O Sangha.   

Abstract

Effectiveness research, economic evaluation, epidemiologic studies of disease consequences and clinical quality management all rely on standardized assessment of disease consequences with psychometrically sound questionnaires. For scientific, ethical and economical reasons, careful selection and evaluation of instruments is critical. Selection of instruments includes searches of medical databases (e.g. MEDLINE), testing of face-validity (does the instrument measure what we intend to measure?), and compatibility (is the instrument used internationally?). Evaluation of instruments includes the assessment of reliability, internal consistency and sensitivity. Most important is careful consideration of the practical usefulness (Interpretation of scores and scales, acceptance in the study population). Contact with instrument developers is advisable (Copyright issues, scoring, current version).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9465379     DOI: 10.1007/s003930050040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Rheumatol        ISSN: 0340-1855            Impact factor:   1.372


  3 in total

Review 1.  The burden of arthritis and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory treatment. A European literature review.

Authors:  E Hunsche; J V Chancellor; N Bruce
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  [Flexible rehabilitation times after total hip and knee replacement].

Authors:  T Tuncel; S Simon; K M Peters
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Questionnaires for patients with back pain. Diagnosis and outcome assessment].

Authors:  A Junge; A F Mannion
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.