Literature DB >> 9465157

Evaluation of methods for isolation of DNA from slowly and rapidly growing mycobacteria.

Z Q Zhang, M Ishaque.   

Abstract

Mycobacteria generally have thick cell walls and contain large amounts of lipid, making them resistant to DNA extraction. Five methods, namely, extensive enzymic digestion method (M1), 2-min mechanical glass-bead disruption method (M2), thermal shock method (M3), modified conventional enzymic digestion method (M4), and manual disruption with modified conventional enzymic digestion method (M5), were used to compare their effectiveness and simplicity in extracting DNA from slowly growing mycobacteria (Mycobacterium leprae, M. lepraemurium and M. bovis BCG), and a rapidly growing mycobacterium (M. phlei). The highest DNA yield was obtained by M2 from M. lepraemurium which produced 2.82 micrograms DNA/mg wet weight of cells, representing a theoretical yield of 78%. M3 gave the lowest DNA yield; 0.01 microgram DNA/mg wet weight of cells of M. lepraemurium was obtained. M4, in which proteinase K was used, is more effective than M1, in which subtilisin and pronase were used. M5 yielded a higher amount of DNA, but it required more manipulations to extract DNA as compared to M4. Extraction of DNA of M. leprae from nude mice is more difficult than that of M. leprae from armadillos by all of the methods used. These results suggest that the biosynthetic capabilities of these two forms of M. leprae may vary, depending on their cultural conditions and/or strain differences. Our results have shown that both M2 and M4 are the simplest, most effective and time-saving methods which are suitable for every routine laboratory to extract DNA from slowly and rapidly growing mycobacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9465157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis        ISSN: 0148-916X


  7 in total

1.  High-throughput plasmid purification for capillary sequencing.

Authors:  C J Elkin; P M Richardson; H M Fourcade; N M Hammon; M J Pollard; P F Predki; T Glavina; T L Hawkins
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Optimized method for preparation of DNA from pathogenic and environmental mycobacteria.

Authors:  Michael Käser; Marie-Thérèse Ruf; Julia Hauser; Laurent Marsollier; Gerd Pluschke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Inducible and Acquired Clarithromycin Resistance in the Mycobacterium abscessus Complex.

Authors:  Marc Rubio; Francesca March; Montserrat Garrigó; Carmen Moreno; Montserrat Español; Pere Coll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) with Slit Skin Smear Examination (SSS) to Confirm Clinical Diagnosis of Leprosy in Eastern Nepal.

Authors:  Shraddha Siwakoti; Keshav Rai; Narayan Raj Bhattarai; Sudha Agarwal; Basudha Khanal
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-12-27

5.  Comparison of DNA Extraction Protocols and Molecular Targets to Diagnose Tuberculous Meningitis.

Authors:  Flavia Silva Palomo; Martha Gabriela Celle Rivero; Milene Gonçalves Quiles; Fernando Pereira Pinto; Antonia Maria de Oliveira Machado; Antonio Carlos Campos Pignatari
Journal:  Tuberc Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-30

6.  Rapid detection of Mycobacterium bovis DNA in cattle lymph nodes with visible lesions using PCR.

Authors:  G Michael Taylor; Danny R Worth; Si Palmer; Keith Jahans; R Glyn Hewinson
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  A method for assessing efficiency of bacterial cell disruption and DNA release.

Authors:  Olle M de Bruin; H C Birnboim
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.605

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.