Literature DB >> 9464663

Helicopters, hearts and hips: using willingness to pay to set priorities for public sector health care programmes.

J A Olsen1, C Donaldson.   

Abstract

The paper reports from a study that asked 150 interviewees their willingness to pay (WTP) in increased earmarked taxation for three different health care programmes: a helicopter ambulance service, more heart operations and more hip replacements. Reasons behind the stated WTP were asked for. Ordinary least squares regression analyses were used to analyse factors associated with WTP for each of the three programmes, and factors associated with the relative WTP for one programme compared with the total of the three. Comparisons were made of WTP for these programmes and the health outcome in terms of quality adjusted life years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9464663     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00129-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  26 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluation of pharmacy services--fact or fiction?

Authors:  B George; J Silcock
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

Review 2.  Recent advances in the methods of cost-benefit analysis in healthcare. Matching the art to the science.

Authors:  E McIntosh; C Donaldson; M Ryan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Recent advances. Medical ethics.

Authors:  P A Singer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-29

4.  Creativity and sacrifice: two sides of the coin. A reply to David Seedhouse.

Authors:  S Farrar; C Donaldson; S Macphee; A Walker; T Mapp
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1997-12

Review 5.  Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.

Authors:  Andreas Hasman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

6.  Perspective and desire in comparative effectiveness research: the relative unimportance of mere preferences, the central importance of context.

Authors:  Anthony J Culyer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Priority setting in the Provincial Health Services Authority: case study for the 2005/06 planning cycle.

Authors:  Craig Mitton; Jennifer Mackenzie; Lynda Cranston; Flora Teng
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-07

Review 8.  Using the stated preference technique for eliciting valuations: the role of the payment vehicle.

Authors:  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  The value of a QALY: individual willingness to pay for health gains under risk.

Authors:  Ana Bobinac; Job van Exel; Frans F H Rutten; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Conjoint analysis of a new Chemotherapy: willingness to pay and preference for the features of raltitrexed versus standard therapy in advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Mike Aristides; Jack Chen; Mark Schulz; Eve Williamson; Stephen Clarke; Kaye Grant
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.