Literature DB >> 9463842

Single trial variability within the P300 (250-500 ms) processing window in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

I Lazzaro1, J Anderson, E Gordon, S Clarke, J Leong, R Meares.   

Abstract

The traditional averaging process used to derive event related potential components (ERPs) is a soundly based method of determining the underlying ERP. Averaging, however, ignores the variability due to the single-trial ERPs that constitute the traditional average ERP. This variability may reflect complementary functional information to the average measure. Our group applied a simple procedure, the response variance curve (RVC), which measures single-trial ERP variability relative to their average. In this study, the average ERP and RVC measures (generated from the same single-trial task-relevant target ERPs) were assessed in an auditory oddball paradigm, in 17 unmedicated male adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and in 17 age- and sex-matched normal controls. P300 amplitude, latency and point of maximum variability of the RVC were measured within the P300 processing window (250-500 ms post-stimulus). There were no significant differences in P300 amplitude or latency between the groups. Unmedicated ADHD patients, however, showed significantly increased single-trial variability within the P300 window compared with controls. This variability was significantly reduced with stimulant medication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9463842     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1781(97)00107-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  11 in total

1.  Within-subject variability during spatial working memory in children with ADHD: an event-related potentials study.

Authors:  I Myatchin; J Lemiere; M Danckaerts; L Lagae
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Frequency-specific coupling between trial-to-trial fluctuations of neural responses and response-time variability.

Authors:  Nicoletta Adamo; Sarah Baumeister; Sarah Hohmann; Isabella Wolf; Nathalie Holz; Regina Boecker; Manfred Laucht; Tobias Banaschewski; Daniel Brandeis
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 3.  Raising attention to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Stefano Pallanti; Luana Salerno
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-22

4.  Possible Effects of Copper and Ceruloplasmin Levels on Auditory Event Potentials in Boys with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Özgür Yorbik; Caner Mutlu; Mehmet Fatih Özdağ; Abdullah Olgun; Gül Eryilmaz; Semih Ayta
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.339

5.  Response variability in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: a neuronal and glial energetics hypothesis.

Authors:  Vivienne A Russell; Robert D Oades; Rosemary Tannock; Peter R Killeen; Judith G Auerbach; Espen B Johansen; Terje Sagvolden
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 3.759

6.  A comparative study on the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying effects of methylphenidate and neurofeedback on inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Julia Friedrich; Marie Luise Schreiter; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 7.  Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Jonna Kuntsi; Gráinne McLoughlin; Philip Asherson
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Amplitude variability over trials in hemodynamic responses in adolescents with ADHD: The role of the anterior default mode network and the non-specific role of the striatum.

Authors:  L Sørensen; T Eichele; H van Wageningen; K J Plessen; M C Stevens
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Altered Auditory P300 Performance in Parents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Offspring.

Authors:  Mei Hung Chi; Ching-Lin Chu; I Hui Lee; Yi-Ting Hsieh; Ko Chin Chen; Po See Chen; Yen Kuang Yang
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  Machine-learning-based classification between post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder using P300 features.

Authors:  Miseon Shim; Min Jin Jin; Chang-Hwan Im; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.