Literature DB >> 9463557

[The age correction of survival probabilities in cancer studies].

P Martus1, S Birkenhake, R Sauer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Survival of elder oncological patients may depend on the tumor disease, on reasons not related to the underlying disease or simply on patient's age. Therefore patient' age has to be taken into account if the objective of an oncological study is the disease-related survival. Basically, there are 3 different approaches: multivariate statistical modelling, estimation of disease-related survival after censoring of cases with cause of death not due to the tumor disease, and consideration of demographical data in the general population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our paper deals with the age correction using the data from the 1986/88 census in Germany. We have written a computer program based on SPSSWIN, which allows an automated age correction. Using clinical data of radiotherapy after surgical therapy of bladder cancer, we illustrate the method.
RESULTS: The estimated 5-year-survival using the age correction was--dependent on patient's age in the sample--10% up to 15% higher than the uncorrected rate. In the whole sample of 333 unselected patients, 5-year-survival was corrected from 47% to 59%. In the normal population adjusted for age- and sex-distribution, the expected survival rate was 80%.
CONCLUSIONS: The age correction has substantial influence on survival analysis of male patients elder than 60 years and female patients elder than 70 years. It should therefore be used in oncological studies investigating long-term survival of patients in these age-groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9463557     DOI: 10.1007/bf03038220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  5 in total

1.  Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival.

Authors:  S J CUTLER; F EDERER
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1958-12

Review 2.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume II--The design and analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  N E Breslow; N E Day
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1987

3.  Long term survival analysis: the curability of breast cancer.

Authors:  S J Pocock; S M Gore; G R Kerr
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1982 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A method for analyzing mortality data collected in follow-up studies.

Authors:  R F Woolson; M T Tsuang; J A Fleming
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  Efficacy of radiochemotherapy with platin derivatives compared to radiotherapy alone in organ-sparing treatment of bladder cancer.

Authors:  R Sauer; S Birkenhake; R Kühn; C Wittekind; K M Schrott; P Martus
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  [Surviving is not equal to survival?].

Authors:  P Martus
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-04-15

2.  [Social gradient of PSA screening? 8 years follow up from the cancer registry of the tumor center in Regensburg].

Authors:  T Klotz; M J Mathers; M Gerken; M Klinkhammer-Schalke; F Hofstädter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Radiotherapy alone or radiochemotherapy with platin derivatives following transurethral resection of the bladder. Organ preservation and survival after treatment of bladder cancer.

Authors:  S Birkenhake; P Martus; R Kühn; K M Schrott; R Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.621

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.