Literature DB >> 9462773

Anatomical variations in pressures generated by pressure garments.

H Giele1, K Liddiard, K Booth, F Wood.   

Abstract

Pressure therapy is the predominant means for prophylaxis and treatment of hypertrophic scar. Despite this, there is little scientific evidence to support its use. This study examines the pressures generated by pressure garments in four subjects at 36 different anatomical sites chosen to represent the varying body geometry. Direct subdermal pressures were measured by an established method, though novel for this application. Pressure garments create a mean increase in subdermal pressures of 22.2 mmHg (range -10 to 102 mmHg). A significant objective difference exists in pressures generated at different anatomical sites. These differences correlate to local tissue compliance and to known areas of good clinical response and inversely correlate to the radius of anatomic curvature. The data suggest that pressures around 15 mmHg are required to effect a positive scar response and that close experienced monitoring of garments be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9462773     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199802000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  3 in total

Review 1.  Up-to-date approach to manage keloids and hypertrophic scars: a useful guide.

Authors:  Anna I Arno; Gerd G Gauglitz; Juan P Barret; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  A portable automatic pressure delivery system for scar compression therapy in large animals.

Authors:  Pejhman Ghassemi; Jeffrey W Shupp; Taryn E Travis; Andrew J Gravunder; Lauren T Moffatt; Jessica C Ramella-Roman
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.523

Review 3.  The effectiveness of pressure therapy (15-25 mmHg) for hypertrophic burn scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin-Wei Ai; Jiang-Tao Liu; Sheng-Duo Pei; Yu Liu; De-Sheng Li; Hong-Ming Lin; Bin Pei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.