OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the predictive value of rises in IgM class antibodies against double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) for ensuing relapses in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in comparison with rises in IgG class antibodies. In addition, it was analysed whether rises in IgM class anti-dsDNA were associated with specific clinical manifestations of SLE. METHODS: Thirty four of a cohort of 72 SLE patients who were positive for IgM class anti-dsDNA at the start of the study or at the time of a relapse were analysed monthly for class specific anti-dsDNA levels during a median observation period of 19.6 months. Disease activity was scored according to the SLE Disease Activity Index. Anti-dsDNA were measured by IgM and IgG class enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by Farr assay. RESULTS: During the study 18 of 34 patients experienced 26 relapses. Twenty two (85%) of the relapses were accompanied by a positive test for IgM class anti-dsDNA by ELISA, 23 (89%) were positive for IgG class anti-dsDNA by ELISA, and 25 (96%) were positive by Farr assay. Patients with rises in IgG class anti-dsDNA by ELISA or in anti-dsDNA by Farr assay had a significantly higher cumulative risk for relapses than patients without those increases (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively). This was not the case for rises in IgM class anti-dsDNA (p = 0.16). Moreover, a rise in IgM class anti-dsDNA before a relapse was not associated, expressed in terms of odds ratios, with specific clinical manifestations of SLE. CONCLUSION: Relapses of SLE are frequently accompanied by IgM class anti-dsDNA. Rises of IgM class anti-dsDNA, in contrast with rises in IgG class anti-dsDNA, are not a sensitive tool for predicting a relapse and are not associated with specific clinical manifestations of SLE.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the predictive value of rises in IgM class antibodies against double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) for ensuing relapses in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in comparison with rises in IgG class antibodies. In addition, it was analysed whether rises in IgM class anti-dsDNA were associated with specific clinical manifestations of SLE. METHODS: Thirty four of a cohort of 72 SLEpatients who were positive for IgM class anti-dsDNA at the start of the study or at the time of a relapse were analysed monthly for class specific anti-dsDNA levels during a median observation period of 19.6 months. Disease activity was scored according to the SLE Disease Activity Index. Anti-dsDNA were measured by IgM and IgG class enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by Farr assay. RESULTS: During the study 18 of 34 patients experienced 26 relapses. Twenty two (85%) of the relapses were accompanied by a positive test for IgM class anti-dsDNA by ELISA, 23 (89%) were positive for IgG class anti-dsDNA by ELISA, and 25 (96%) were positive by Farr assay. Patients with rises in IgG class anti-dsDNA by ELISA or in anti-dsDNA by Farr assay had a significantly higher cumulative risk for relapses than patients without those increases (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively). This was not the case for rises in IgM class anti-dsDNA (p = 0.16). Moreover, a rise in IgM class anti-dsDNA before a relapse was not associated, expressed in terms of odds ratios, with specific clinical manifestations of SLE. CONCLUSION: Relapses of SLE are frequently accompanied by IgM class anti-dsDNA. Rises of IgM class anti-dsDNA, in contrast with rises in IgG class anti-dsDNA, are not a sensitive tool for predicting a relapse and are not associated with specific clinical manifestations of SLE.
Authors: M N Hylkema; H Huygen; C Kramers; T J vd Wal; J de Jong; M C van Bruggen; A J Swaak; J H Berden; R J Smeenk Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 1994-03-29 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: D A Isenberg; C Dudeney; W Williams; I Addison; S Charles; J Clarke; A Todd-Pokropek Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 1987-06 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: H Bootsma; P Spronk; R Derksen; G de Boer; H Wolters-Dicke; J Hermans; P Limburg; F Gmelig-Meyling; L Kater; C Kallenberg Journal: Lancet Date: 1995-06-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Laura J McCloskey; Paul Christner; Dana Jacobs-Kosmin; Troy D Jaskowski; Harry R Hill; Gabriella Lakos; Marius Teodorescu Journal: J Clin Lab Anal Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.352