Literature DB >> 9460995

Stochastic modelling of tumorigenesis in p53 deficient mice.

J H Mao1, K A Lindsay, A Balmain, T E Wheldon.   

Abstract

Stochastic models of tumorigenesis have been developed to investigate the implications of experimental data on tumour induction in wild-type and p53-deficient mice for tumorigenesis mechanisms. Conventional multistage models in which inactivation of each p53 allele represents a distinct stage predict excessively large numbers of tumours in p53-deficient genotypes, allowing this category of model to be rejected. Multistage multipath models, in which a p53-mediated pathway co-exists with one or more p53-independent pathways, are consistent with the data, although these models require unknown pathways and do not enable age-specific curves of tumour appearance to be computed. An alternative model that fits the data is the 'multigate' model in which tumorigenesis results from a small number of gate-pass (enabling) events independently of p53 status. The role of p53 inactivation is as a rate modifier that accelerates the gate-pass events. This model implies that wild-type p53 acts as a 'caretaker' to maintain genetic uniformity in cell populations, and that p53 inactivation increases the probability of occurrence of a viable cellular mutant by a factor of about ten. The multigate model predicts a relationship between the time pattern of tumour occurrence and tumour genotype that should be experimentally testable. Stochastic modelling may help to distinguish 'gatekeeper' and 'caretaker' genes in other tumorigenic pathays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9460995      PMCID: PMC2151221          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  29 in total

1.  Altered cell cycle arrest and gene amplification potential accompany loss of wild-type p53.

Authors:  L R Livingstone; A White; J Sprouse; E Livanos; T Jacks; T D Tlsty
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-09-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Mutator phenotype may be required for multistage carcinogenesis.

Authors:  L A Loeb
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Cancer. p53, guardian of the genome.

Authors:  D P Lane
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Cancer-susceptibility genes. Gatekeepers and caretakers.

Authors:  K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Mice deficient for p53 are developmentally normal but susceptible to spontaneous tumours.

Authors:  L A Donehower; M Harvey; B L Slagle; M J McArthur; C A Montgomery; J S Butel; A Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Wild-type p53 restores cell cycle control and inhibits gene amplification in cells with mutant p53 alleles.

Authors:  Y Yin; M A Tainsky; F Z Bischoff; L C Strong; G M Wahl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-09-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  p53 mutations in human cancers.

Authors:  M Hollstein; D Sidransky; B Vogelstein; C C Harris
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes in transgenic mouse models of neoplasia.

Authors:  D J Fowlis; A Balmain
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma.

Authors:  A G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Multistage carcinogenesis: population-based model for colon cancer.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar; E G Luebeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  5 in total

1.  Generation of oscillations by the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop: a theoretical and experimental study.

Authors:  R Lev Bar-Or; R Maya; L A Segel; U Alon; A J Levine; M Oren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Cancer models, genomic instability and somatic cellular Darwinian evolution.

Authors:  Mark P Little
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 3.  Systems biological and mechanistic modelling of radiation-induced cancer.

Authors:  M P Little; W F Heidenreich; S H Moolgavkar; H Schöllnberger; D C Thomas
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Unbalanced replication as a major source of genetic instability in cancer cells.

Authors:  Daniel Corcos
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2012-10-20

5.  Timed somatic deletion of p53 in mice reveals age-associated differences in tumor progression.

Authors:  George Hinkal; Neha Parikh; Lawrence A Donehower
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.