Literature DB >> 9460653

Two complementary bioassays for screening the estrogenic potency of xenobiotics: recombinant yeast for trout estrogen receptor and trout hepatocyte cultures.

F Petit1, P Le Goff, J P Cravédi, Y Valotaire, F Pakdel.   

Abstract

A relation between the chemical structure of a xenobiotic and its steroidal action has not yet been clearly established. Thus, it is not possible to define the estrogenic potency of different xenobiotics. An assessment may be accomplished by the use of different bioassays. We have previously developed a yeast system highly and stably expressing rainbow trout estrogen receptor (rtER) in order to analyze the biological activity of the receptor. The recombinant yeast system appears to be a reliable, rapid and sensitive bioassay for the screening and determination of the direct interaction between ER and estrogenic compounds. This system was used in parallel with a more elaborate biological system, trout hepatocyte aggregate cultures, to examine the estrogenic potency of a wide spectrum of chemicals commonly found in the environment. In hepatocyte cultures, the vitellogenin gene whose expression is principally dependent upon estradiol was used as a biomarker. Moreover, competitive binding assays were performed to determine direct interaction between rtER and xenobiotics. In our study, 50% of the 49 chemical compounds tested exhibited estrogenic activity in the two bioassays: the herbicide diclofop-methyl; the fungicides biphenyl, dodemorph, and triadimefon; the insecticides lindane, methyl parathion, chlordecone, dieldrin, and endosulfan; polychlorinated biphenyl mixtures; the plasticizers or detergents alkylphenols and phthalates; and phytoestrogens. To investigate further biphenyl estrogenic activity, its principal metabolites were also tested in both bioassays. Among these estrogenic compounds, 70% were able to activate rtER in yeast and hepatocytes with variable induction levels according to the system. Nevertheless, 30% of these estrogenic compounds exhibited estrogenic activity in only one of the bioassays, suggesting the implication of metabolites or different pathways in the activation of gene transcription. This paper shows that it is important to combine in vivo bioassays with in vitro approaches to elucidate the mechanism of xenoestrogen actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9460653     DOI: 10.1677/jme.0.0190321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0952-5041            Impact factor:   5.098


  16 in total

1.  Xenoestrogens are potent activators of nongenomic estrogenic responses.

Authors:  Cheryl S Watson; Nataliya N Bulayeva; Ann L Wozniak; Rebecca A Alyea
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Toxicity, dioxin-like activities, and endocrine effects of DDT metabolites--DDA, DDMU, DDMS, and DDCN.

Authors:  Bernhard Wetterauer; Mathias Ricking; Jens C Otte; Arnold V Hallare; Andrew Rastall; Lothar Erdinger; Jan Schwarzbauer; Thomas Braunbeck; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  The effects of estrogenic and androgenic endocrine disruptors on the immune system of fish: a review.

Authors:  Sylvain Milla; Sophie Depiereux; Patrick Kestemont
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Analysis of gene expression profiles in largemouth bass exposed to 17-beta-estradiol and to anthropogenic contaminants that behave as estrogens.

Authors:  P Larkin; T Sabo-Attwood; J Kelso; N D Denslow
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Time-dependent degradation and toxicity of diclofop-methyl in algal suspensions : emerging contaminants.

Authors:  Xiyun Cai; Jing Ye; Guangyao Sheng; Weiping Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Cell bioassays for detection of aryl hydrocarbon (AhR) and estrogen receptor (ER) mediated activity in environmental samples.

Authors:  K Hilscherova; M Machala; K Kannan; A L Blankenship; J P Giesy
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Using in vitro high throughput screening assays to identify potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Daniel M Rotroff; David J Dix; Keith A Houck; Thomas B Knudsen; Matthew T Martin; Keith W McLaurin; David M Reif; Kevin M Crofton; Amar V Singh; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Richard S Judson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Phytoestrogens in human pregnancy.

Authors:  John Jarrell; Warren G Foster; David W Kinniburgh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2012-05-14

9.  High incidence of a male-specific genetic marker in phenotypic female chinook salmon from the Columbia River.

Authors:  J J Nagler; J Bouma; G H Thorgaard; D D Dauble
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Assessment and molecular actions of endocrine-disrupting chemicals that interfere with estrogen receptor pathways.

Authors:  Gwenneg Kerdivel; Denis Habauzit; Farzad Pakdel
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.257

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.