K A Puntillo1, M L Neighbor. 1. Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California-San Francisco School of Nursing, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Each year emergency departments see millions of patients' many with moderate to severe pain. The use of valid, language-sensitive pain assessment methods is a critical prerequisite to selection and evaluation of pain treatment interventions. However, scant research has been conducted on the validity of pain intensity measurements in English-speaking and non-English-speaking ED patients. This study validated two measures of pain intensity--a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS) and a word descriptor scale (WDS)--in English-speaking and Spanish-speaking ED patients and determined patient preferences for the pain rating scales. METHODS: ED patients with various medical conditions were asked to rate their pain intensity using both scales, in their language, seven times during a 2-hour study period. Patients were then asked to choose the pain scale that they preferred to use. RESULTS: Moderate to strong correlations were found between the NRS and WDS pain scales. In addition, the NRS and WDS were equally preferred by patients, whether they spoke English (n = 95) or Spanish (n = 21). DISCUSSION: We demonstrated in this study that both the NRS and the WDS scales were valid instruments for measuring pain in English-speaking and Spanish-speaking ED patients. In addition, very little difference was found in patient preference for one of the scales. ED patients in acute pain were able to use both ways of communicating their pain to health professionals. Therefore patients could be offered their choice of either of these simple pain rating scales to evaluate pain and the effectiveness of pain-relieving interventions.
INTRODUCTION: Each year emergency departments see millions of patients' many with moderate to severe pain. The use of valid, language-sensitive pain assessment methods is a critical prerequisite to selection and evaluation of pain treatment interventions. However, scant research has been conducted on the validity of pain intensity measurements in English-speaking and non-English-speaking ED patients. This study validated two measures of pain intensity--a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS) and a word descriptor scale (WDS)--in English-speaking and Spanish-speaking ED patients and determined patient preferences for the pain rating scales. METHODS: ED patients with various medical conditions were asked to rate their pain intensity using both scales, in their language, seven times during a 2-hour study period. Patients were then asked to choose the pain scale that they preferred to use. RESULTS: Moderate to strong correlations were found between the NRS and WDS pain scales. In addition, the NRS and WDS were equally preferred by patients, whether they spoke English (n = 95) or Spanish (n = 21). DISCUSSION: We demonstrated in this study that both the NRS and the WDS scales were valid instruments for measuring pain in English-speaking and Spanish-speaking ED patients. In addition, very little difference was found in patient preference for one of the scales. ED patients in acute pain were able to use both ways of communicating their pain to health professionals. Therefore patients could be offered their choice of either of these simple pain rating scales to evaluate pain and the effectiveness of pain-relieving interventions.
Authors: Maria T Chao; Dean Schillinger; Unity Nguyen; Trilce Santana; Rhianon Liu; Steve Gregorich; Frederick M Hecht Journal: Pain Med Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Rosanne van Seben; Kenneth E Covinsky; Lucienne A Reichardt; Jesse J Aarden; Marike van der Schaaf; Martin van der Esch; Raoul H H Engelbert; Jos W R Twisk; Jos A Bosch; Bianca M Buurman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Lucienne A Reichardt; Jesse J Aarden; Rosanne van Seben; Marike van der Schaaf; Raoul H H Engelbert; Jos A Bosch; Bianca M Buurman Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2016-03-05 Impact factor: 3.921