Literature DB >> 9459808

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic management of urolithiasis.

R Sinha1, N Sharma.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyelolithomy (Lap PL) and ureterolithotomy (Lap UL) were performed in 20 and 24 patients, respectively. The average operating time was 61.4 minutes for Lap UL and 80.2 minutes for Lap PL. The conversion rate for Lap PL was 4 (20%) patients, and none of the Lap ULs required conversion. There were no major postoperative complications, except prolonged tube drainage in 2 patients, and the average hospital stay was 3.6 days.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1997        PMID： 9459808     DOI： 10.1089/lap.1997.7.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN： 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  11 in total

1.  The comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of solitary large renal pelvic stones.

Authors:  Ahmet Tefekli; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Tolga Akman; Muzaffer Akçay; Murat Baykal; Mert Ali Karadağ; Ahmet Y Muslumanoglu; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-02-04

Review 2.  Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Athanasios G Papatsoris; Stefanos Albanis; Dean Assimos
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-16

3.  [Comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal pelvic stones larger than 2.5 cm].

Authors:  Xiao-Yong Pu; Jiu-Min Liu; Xue-Cheng Bi; Dong Li; Shang Huang; Yan-Hua Feng; Chu-Qi Lin
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-02-20

4.  Evaluation of the role of preoperative Double-J ureteral stenting in retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Anuj Deep Dangi; Nikhil Gupta; Anubhav Vindal; Pawanindra Lal; V K Ramteke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Analysis of complications from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years.

Authors:  Dimitri Liapis; Alexandre de la Taille; Guillaume Ploussard; Grégoire Robert; Laurence Bastien; Andras Hoznek; Dimitri Vordos; Claude Abbou; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Flexible ureteroscopic renal stone extraction during laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in patients with large upper ureteral stone and small renal stones.

Authors:  Jae Hyung You; Young Gon Kim; Myung Ki Kim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Should we place ureteral stents in retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy?: Consideration of surgical techniques and complications.

Authors:  Jae Hyung You; Young Gon Kim; Myung Ki Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-08-08

8.  Comparative study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large renal pelvic stones.

Authors:  Yasser M Haggag; Gamal Morsy; Magdy M Badr; Abdel Baset A Al Emam; Mourad Farid; Mohamed Etafy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus extra corporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for management of renal stones.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Nikhil Gupta; Pawanindra Lal; Pawan Lal; Vinod K Ramteke
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Laparoscopy in the management of stone disease of urinary tract.

Authors:  Rajiv Yadav; Rajeev Kumar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.407
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.