Literature DB >> 9459111

Pressure support ventilation in adult respiratory distress syndrome: short-term effects of a servocontrolled mode.

S G Zakynthinos1, T Vassilakopoulos, Z Daniil, E Zakynthinos, E Koutsoukos, K Katsouyianni, C Roussos.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the short-term effects of pressure support ventilation in adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), we studied 17 patients with moderate to severe ARDS using mandatory rate ventilation (MRV), a servocontrolled mode of PSV having respiratory rate as the targeted parameter.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the duration of ARDS, the patients were divided into two groups: Group 1, early ARDS (duration up to 1 week), 10 patients; Group 2, intermediate ARDS (duration between 1 and 2 weeks). The patients were initially ventilated with assisted mechanical ventilation then with MRV, and finally with controlled mechanical ventilation. After a 20-minute period allowed for stabilization in each mode, ventilatory variables, gas exchange, hemodynamics, and patient's inspiratory effort were evaluated.
RESULTS: During MRV blood gases, airway pressures and hemodynamic variables remained within acceptable limits in all patients. Compared with assisted mechanical ventilation, during MRV, patients of group 1 decreased their VT and V (from 0.64 +/- 0.04 to 0.42 +/- 0.03 L/sec) and increased their TI/TT (from 0.39 +/- 0.03 to 0.52 +/- 0.03). f did not change. PAO2 - PaO2 and QS/QT decreased (from 306 +/- 16 to 269 +/- 15 mm Hg, and from 20.2 +/- 1.4 to 17.5 +/- 1.1, respectively), while PaCO2 increased (from 44 +/- 3 to 50 +/- 3 mm Hg). On the contrary, patients of group 2 increased their VT (from 0.69 +/- 0.02 to 0.92 +/- 0.09 L), decreased their f (from 22.3 +/- 0.5 to 19.3 +/- 0.3 b/min), although they did not change their V and TI/TT. PAO2 - PaO2 and QS/QT remained stable. PaCO2 diminished (from 39 +/- 3 to 34 +/- 3 mm Hg). Pressure support level was higher in group 2 than in group 1 (29.4 +/- 3.0 v 19.8 +/- 2.9 cm H2O).
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (1) PSV delivered by MRV may adequately ventilate patients with moderate to severe ARDS, preserving gas exchange and hemodynamics, at least for the short period tested; (2) early and intermediate ARDS respond in a different manner to MRV in terms of breathing pattern, gas exchange, and level of pressure assistance; and (3) patients with early ARDS are those who have an improvement in intrapulmonary oxygenation probably due, at least in part, to alveolar recruitment augmented by active diaphragmatic contraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9459111     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-9441(97)90027-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  3 in total

Review 1.  Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction: the clinical relevance of animal models.

Authors:  Theodoros Vassilakopoulos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Bench-to-bedside review: weaning failure--should we rest the respiratory muscles with controlled mechanical ventilation?

Authors:  Theodoros Vassilakopoulos; Spyros Zakynthinos; Charis Roussos
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 3.  Partial ventilatory support modalities in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome-a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah M McMullen; Maureen Meade; Louise Rose; Karen Burns; Sangeeta Mehta; Robert Doyle; Dietrich Henzler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.