Literature DB >> 9457941

Experience with a novel vaginal progesterone preparation in a donor oocyte program.

W E Gibbons1, J P Toner, P Hamacher, P Kolm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a vaginal progesterone preparation with our standard IM preparation within a donor egg program.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial.
SETTING: Donor egg program at a university assisted reproductive therapy program (Jones Institute for Women's Health). PATIENT(S): Couples accepted into the donor egg program because of either premature ovarian failure or evidence of diminished ovarian reserve. INTERVENTION(S): Women were randomized into either a group receiving IM progesterone replacement or a group receiving vaginal progesterone replacement. Both groups underwent Estraderm patch/progesterone treatment in a mock cycle leading to an endometrial biopsy on day 26 followed by a second cycle in which ET was performed. Subjects with residual ovarian function received a GnRH agonist. In the IM treatment group, 100 mg was administered from cycle days 15 to 27. In the vaginal treatment group, Crinone 8%, a polycarbophil-based gel preparation containing 90 mg of micronized progesterone, was administered twice daily from the evening of day 14. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Endometrial histology, serum levels of progesterone (on days 13, 17, 20, 24, and 26), the occurrence of pregnancy, implantation rate, and pregnancy outcome. RESULT(S): Fifty-four women randomized into the vaginal progesterone treatment group and 18 women in the IM treatment group achieved ET. Mean serum progesterone levels were higher in the IM treatment group than in the Crinone group. Endometrial histology was "in phase" for all subjects in both groups. Clinical pregnancies were observed in 26 of 54 women and 5 of 18 women in the Crinone and IM progesterone groups, respectively. The ongoing pregnancy rate (PR) of 31% (17/54) and implantation rate of 23% in the subjects receiving Crinone was not statistically different from the IM progesterone group's ongoing PR of 22% (4/18) and implantation rate of 18%.
CONCLUSION: Vaginal progesterone replacement with the polycarbophil gel preparation was as effective as IM progesterone in producing clinical and ongoing pregnancies within our donor egg program in the dosages administered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9457941     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00457-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  16 in total

1.  Has ART Finally Got a Patient-Friendly Progesterone?

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-10

2.  Pregnancy outcomes in oocyte donation recipients: vaginal gel versus intramuscular injection progesterone replacement.

Authors:  Brian M Berger; James A Phillips
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Impact of serum estradiol levels on the implantation rate of cleavage stage cryopreserved-thawed embryos transferred in programmed cycles with exogenous hormonal replacement.

Authors:  Silvina Bocca; Elvira Bondía Real; Susanna Lynch; Laurel Stadtmauer; Hind Beydoun; Jacob Mayer; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Subclinical pregnancy losses among women undergoing in-vitro fertilization with ICSI.

Authors:  Ulun Ulug; Suleyman Tosun; Esra Aksoy Jozwiak; Ali Mesut; Alper Sismanoglu; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Progestin treatment for the prevention of preterm birth.

Authors:  Miha Lucovnik; Ruben J Kuon; Linda R Chambliss; William L Maner; Shao-Qing Shi; Leili Shi; James Balducci; Robert E Garfield
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Comparison of daily vaginal progesterone gel plus weekly intramuscular progesterone with daily intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in single, autologous euploid frozen-thawed embryo transfers.

Authors:  Mehmet Resit Asoglu; Cem Celik; Lale Susan Karakis; Necati Findikli; Meral Gultomruk; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Progesterone and the luteal phase: a requisite to reproduction.

Authors:  Tolga B Mesen; Steven L Young
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 8.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

9.  Luteal phase bleeding after IVF cycles: comparison between progesterone vaginal gel and intramuscular progesterone and correlation with pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Sami Jabara; Kurt Barnhart; Joan C Schertz; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Exp Clin Assist Reprod       Date:  2009-10-20

10.  Luteal Phase Support in assisted reproductive technology treatment: focus on Endometrin(R) (progesterone) vaginal insert.

Authors:  Jerome H Check
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.