Literature DB >> 9457720

Comparison of microsuturing to the use of tissue adhesives in anastomosing sciatic nerve cuts in rats.

S S Inalöz1, H E Ak, V Vayla, M Akin, A Aslan, I Sari, Y Celik, U Ozkan.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate and to compare the effects of microsuturing to that of tissue adhesives (Tisseel) on the healing of anastomosing peripheral nerve incisions. Forty-five Wistar-Albino rats were placed in special cages and separated into three groups (n = 15). In the control group, biliteral sciatic nerves were explored but no incision was made. In the first experimental group, bilateral sciatic nerves were incised and end-to-end anastomosing was performed by microsuturing the epineurium. In the second experimental group, tissue adhesive (Tisseel) was used alone in anastomosing the sciatic nerve cuts. Assessments of the healing processes were demonstrated by 1.electromyography (EMG), 2. measuring the electrical responses of the anastomosed nerves after electrical stimuli, 3. histopathological examination. Statistical analysis of the EMG findings showed that the Tisseel group was the closest in the healing process to the control group. After applying electrical stimuli to the dissected nerves, the resistance value of the Tisseel group was nearest to those of the control group. The histopathological examinations showed highly degenerative nerve bundles and prominent foreign body granuloma at the anastomosed sites of the microsutured group. The granulomatous inflammation was observed to be much less in the Tisseel group. We conclude that the healing effect of Tisseel was found to be superior to that of microsuturing as demonstrated by the findings of EMG, electrical responses of the anastomosed nerves, and histopathological examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9457720     DOI: 10.1007/bf01105896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  8 in total

1.  Effects of different methods of peripheral nerve repair on the number and distribution of muscle afferent neurons in rat dorsal root ganglion.

Authors:  L M Myles; J A Gilmour; M A Glasby
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Morphofunctional evaluation of fibrin glue versus microsuture nerve repairs.

Authors:  H Maragh; B S Meyer; D Davenport; J D Gould; J K Terzis
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.873

3.  Repair of motor nerve defects: comparison of suture and fibrin adhesive techniques.

Authors:  S Nishihira; T V McCaffrey
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Timing of peripheral nerve repair: important local neuropathological factors.

Authors:  A R Hudson; D Hunter
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1977

5.  Regeneration of the sciatic nerve in rats. The effect of muscle basement membrane.

Authors:  M A Glasby; S Gschmeissner; R J Hitchcock; C L Huang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1986-11

6.  Comparison of fascicular, interfascicular and epineural suture techniques in the repair of simple nerve lacerations.

Authors:  R Levinthal; W J Brown; R W Rand
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  [Choice of thrombin concentration of common fibrin glue systems for nerve anastomosis].

Authors:  T Herter; D Windmann
Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.018

8.  Peripheral nerve repair in humans using muscle autografts. A new technique.

Authors:  R W Norris; M A Glasby; J M Gattuso; R E Bowden
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1988-08
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  A novel conduit-based coaptation device for primary nerve repair.

Authors:  Ravinder Bamba; D Colton Riley; Nathaniel D Kelm; Nancy Cardwell; Alonda C Pollins; Ashkan Afshari; Lyly Nguyen; Richard D Dortch; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.292

2.  Axonal fusion via conduit-based delivery of hydrophilic polymers.

Authors:  Kevin W Sexton; Charles L Rodriguez-Feo; Richard B Boyer; Gabriel A Del Corral; David C Riley; Alonda C Pollins; Nancy L Cardwell; R Bruce Shack; Lillian B Nanney; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-06-09

3.  Facial nerve repair: fibrin adhesive coaptation versus epineurial suture repair in a rodent model.

Authors:  Christopher J Knox; Marc H Hohman; Ingrid J Kleiss; Julie S Weinberg; James T Heaton; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Multiple uses of fibrin sealant for nervous system treatment following injury and disease.

Authors:  Natalia Perussi Biscola; Luciana Politti Cartarozzi; Suzana Ulian-Benitez; Roberta Barbizan; Mateus Vidigal Castro; Aline Barroso Spejo; Rui Seabra Ferreira; Benedito Barraviera; Alexandre Leite Rodrigues Oliveira
Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-03-14

5.  Fibrin glue repair leads to enhanced axonal elongation during early peripheral nerve regeneration in an in vivo mouse model.

Authors:  Georgios Koulaxouzidis; Gernot Reim; Christian Witzel
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.135

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.