BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal adhesions, obesity, and distorted abdominal anatomy in shunt-dependent hydrocephalic patients are patient characteristics that increase distal ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt failure rates. The use of laparoscopic-aided placement of the distal VP catheter as a technique to decrease the failure rate is evaluated in these patients. METHOD: Thirteen hydrocephalus patients considered to either have intra-abdominal adhesions, be obese, or have distorted abdominal anatomy underwent laparoscopic-aided distal VP catheter placement or revision. Two had shunts placed for the first time and eleven had revisions. Eight patients had revisions performed by both the standard minilaparotomy and laparoscopic methods, but at different times. The average surgical times for both techniques were looked at for these eight patients. Case illustrations are presented. RESULTS: In patients who had both types of abdominal approaches, the average surgical time was 81 min for the laparoscopic-aided technique versus 116 min for the minilaparotomy procedure. The only complication related directly to the laparoscopic procedure was one wound infection. CONCLUSION: In patients with intra-abdominal adhesions, obesity, or distorted abdominal anatomy, laparoscopic-aided distal shunt insertion increases the success rate by its direct visual capability and the ability to lyse abdominal adhesions and position the distal end of the catheter in a desired place.
BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal adhesions, obesity, and distorted abdominal anatomy in shunt-dependent hydrocephalic patients are patient characteristics that increase distal ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt failure rates. The use of laparoscopic-aided placement of the distal VP catheter as a technique to decrease the failure rate is evaluated in these patients. METHOD: Thirteen hydrocephaluspatients considered to either have intra-abdominal adhesions, be obese, or have distorted abdominal anatomy underwent laparoscopic-aided distal VP catheter placement or revision. Two had shunts placed for the first time and eleven had revisions. Eight patients had revisions performed by both the standard minilaparotomy and laparoscopic methods, but at different times. The average surgical times for both techniques were looked at for these eight patients. Case illustrations are presented. RESULTS: In patients who had both types of abdominal approaches, the average surgical time was 81 min for the laparoscopic-aided technique versus 116 min for the minilaparotomy procedure. The only complication related directly to the laparoscopic procedure was one wound infection. CONCLUSION: In patients with intra-abdominal adhesions, obesity, or distorted abdominal anatomy, laparoscopic-aided distal shunt insertion increases the success rate by its direct visual capability and the ability to lyse abdominal adhesions and position the distal end of the catheter in a desired place.
Authors: Joshua L Argo; Durgamani K Yellumahanthi; Naveen Ballem; Mark R Harrigan; Winfield S Fisher; Mary M Wesley; Tracy H Taylor; Ronald H Clements Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2008-12-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; Ryan Khanna; Zachary D Rasmussen; Oliver Flouty; Nader S Dahdaleh; Jeremy Greenlee; Matthew A Howard Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Sherman Yu; Denis D Bensard; David A Partrick; John K Petty; Frederick M Karrer; Richard J Hendrickson Journal: JSLS Date: 2006 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.172