Literature DB >> 9457020

Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial.

J F Tulloch1, C Phillips, W R Proffit.   

Abstract

Preadolescent children with overjet greater than 7 mm were randomly assigned to observation only, headgear (combination), or functional appliance (modified bionator) and were monitored for 15 months. Of the 166 patients who completed this first phase of the trial, 147 continued to a second phase of treatment. The data from the first 107 patients to complete phase 2 are available and form the basis of this progress report. During phase 1, on average there was no change in the jaw relationship of untreated children, but 5% showed considerable improvement and 15% demonstrated worsening. Both early-treatment groups had a significant average reduction in ANB angle, more by change in maxillary dimensions in the headgear group and mandibular growth in the functional appliance group. There were wide variations in response, however, with only 75% of the treated children showing favorable skeletal response. Failure to respond favorably could not be explained by lack of cooperation alone. The preliminary results from phase 2 show that, on average, time in fixed appliances was shorter for children who underwent early treatment, but the total treatment time was considerably longer if the early phase of treatment was included. Only small differences were noted in anteroposterior jaw position between the groups at the completion of treatment, and the changes in dental occlusion, judged on the basis of Peer Assessment Rating scores, were similar between groups. Neither the severity of the initial problem nor the duration of treatment was correlated with the occlusal result. The number of patients who required extraction of permanent teeth was greater in the early functional appliance group than in the headgear or control group. The option of orthognathic surgery was presented more often in the cases of children who did not undergo early treatment, but surgery was accepted or was still being considered almost as frequently in the previous headgear group as in the controls, less often in the patients previously treated with functional appliances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9457020     DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70277-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  18 in total

1.  An international comparison of early treatment of angle Class-II/1 cases. Skeletal effects of the first phase of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  U Ehmer; C J Tulloch; W R Proffit; C Phillips
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes one year post-treatment in Twin Block and FORSUS FRD treated patients.

Authors:  Dinesh Chander Chaudhary; Prasanna Kumar; Mohit Sharma; Karan Nehra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-12-15

3.  Retrospective epidemiological study of mandibular rotational types in patients with orthodontical malocclusion.

Authors:  S Saccomanno; R Deli; G DI Cintio; E DE Corso; G Paludetti; C Grippaudo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.124

4.  The article by Kochel et al. gives rise to certain reservations.

Authors:  Ulrich Fellner
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Three-dimensional condylar changes from Herbst appliance and multibracket treatment: A comparison with matched Class II elastics.

Authors:  Robert Y Wei; Arjun Atresh; Antonio Ruellas; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung Nguyen; Brent E Larson; Jonathan E Mangum; David J Manton; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Mechanism of Class II correction in prepubertal and postpubertal patients with Twin Force Bite Corrector.

Authors:  Aditya Chhibber; Madhur Upadhyay; Flavio Uribe; Ravindra Nanda
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Long-term evaluation of the molar movements following Pendulum and fixed appliances.

Authors:  Alberto Caprioglio; Mattia Fontana; Elena Longoni; Mauro Cozzani
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Activator reloaded - Myofunctional appliance at its best.

Authors:  Anil S Malik; Abhijeet S Karnik
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2011-01

Review 9.  Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Klaus Bsl Batista; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jayne E Harrison; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-13

10.  Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.

Authors:  Nicole J Siara-Olds; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeff Berger; Burcu Bayirli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.